FabDigitFabDigit

PE-RT vs UHMW-PE

Polymer · grade comparison

PE-RT and UHMW-PE are both polymer grades. UHMW-PE is the stronger of the two: yield strength 21 MPa (3.05 ksi) against 18 MPa (2.61 ksi) for PE-RT, about 17% more; tensile strength follows at 40 MPa (5.8 ksi) vs 24 MPa (3.48 ksi). In exchange, PE-RT is the more ductile: elongation 750% versus 350% for UHMW-PE, and UHMW-PE is harder (64 Shore D vs 56 Shore D). PE-RT is stiffer (0.8 GPa vs 0.72 GPa) and UHMW-PE runs hotter in service (80°C vs 70°C continuous). On the shop floor, UHMW-PE machines more easily (very good vs good) and PE-RT welds better (excellent vs poor).

PE-RTChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when it will be welded.

UHMW-PEChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

PE-RT vs UHMW-PE: properties

PE-RTUHMW-PE

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.8 GPa0.12 Msi
0.72 GPa0.1 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.28 GPa0.04 Msi
0.25 GPa0.04 Msi

Bulk Modulus

3 GPa0.38 Msi
—

Poisson's Ratio

0.45
0.46

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

24 MPa3.5 ksi
40 MPa5.8 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

18 MPa2.6 ksi
21 MPa3 ksi

Elongation at Break

750%
350%

Compressive Modulus

0.75 GPa0.11 Msi
0.6 GPa0.09 Msi

Flexural Strength

20 MPa2.9 ksi
25 MPa3.6 ksi

Flexural Modulus

0.7 GPa0.1 Msi
0.75 GPa0.11 Msi

Shear Strength

16 MPa2.3 ksi
22 MPa3.2 ksi

Izod Impact, Notched

250 J/m4.7 ft·lbf/in
1,300 J/m24.3 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

56 Shore D
64 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

40 HRR
50 HRR

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
3.5 MPa·√m3.2 ksi·√in

Same in both: Compressive Strength 20 MPa2.9 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Temperature (Tm)

124°C255 °F
135°C275 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

-110°C-166 °F
-120°C-184 °F

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.03%
0.01%

Refractive Index

—
1.51

Same in both: Density 0.94 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³ · Water Absorption (24 h) 0.01%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.4 W/m·K0.23 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.41 W/m·K0.24 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,900 J/kg·K0.45 BTU/lb·°F
1,840 J/kg·K0.44 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

180 µm/m·K100 µin/in·°F
200 µm/m·K111 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

70°C158 °F
80°C176 °F

Min Service Temperature

-40°C-40 °F
-200°C-328 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

68°C154 °F
80°C176 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

45°C113 °F
44°C111 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

118°C244 °F
80°C176 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

18%
17%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

95°C203 °F
110°C230 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in
1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

22 kV/mm559 V/mil
30 kV/mm762 V/mil

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω
1×10¹⁴ Ω

Same in both: Dielectric Constant (1 MHz) 2.3 · Dissipation Factor (1 MHz) 3×10⁻⁴ · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

92 / 100
90 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

25 / 100
30 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

55 / 100
75 / 100

Weldability

96 / 100
15 / 100

Formability (cold)

92 / 100
55 / 100

Polishability

30 / 100
25 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

2%
3%

Melt Flow Rate

0.9 g/10 min
—

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

215°C419 °F
200°C392 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

30°C86 °F
—

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

80 MJ/kg34,394 BTU/lb
85 MJ/kg36,543 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.1 kg CO₂/kg
3.2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

80 L/kg9.6 gal/lb
100 L/kg12 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

26 kN·m/kg
43 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

0.9 MN·m/kg
0.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

203 kJ/m³
306 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.2 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleUHMW-PEPE-RT

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPE-RTUHMW-PE
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Injection molding—Yes
Default condition—FDA
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall—0.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 0.8 µm
Chrome Plating (Plastic)—Yes
EMI Shielding Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Soft Touch Coating—Yes
Spray Painting—Yes
UV Coating—Yes

PE-RT vs UHMW-PE — frequently asked

Is UHMW-PE stronger than PE-RT?

Yes. UHMW-PE has a typical yield strength of 21 MPa (3.05 ksi) against 18 MPa (2.61 ksi) for PE-RT — about 17% more. Tensile strength is 40 MPa (5.8 ksi) vs 24 MPa (3.48 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PE-RT or UHMW-PE?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, PE-RT or UHMW-PE?

UHMW-PE. Its machinability rates very good (75/100) against good (55/100) for PE-RT; for welding the order is PE-RT first (excellent, 96/100) then UHMW-PE (poor, 15/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PE-RT and UHMW-PE side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.