FabDigitFabDigit

PCTFE vs THV

Polymer · grade comparison

PCTFE and THV are both polymer grades. PCTFE is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 37 MPa (5.37 ksi) against 25 MPa (3.63 ksi) for THV, about 48% more. In exchange, THV is the more ductile: elongation 500% versus 110% for PCTFE, and PCTFE is harder (78 Shore D vs 54 Shore D). THV is lighter (1.97 g/cm³ vs 2.12 g/cm³ for PCTFE) and PCTFE is stiffer (1.5 GPa vs 0.2 GPa). On the shop floor, PCTFE machines more easily (very good vs fair), THV welds better (excellent vs poor), and THV sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than PCTFE (specialty, $$$$$).

PCTFEChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

THVChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

PCTFE vs THV: properties

PCTFETHV

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

1.5 GPa0.22 Msi
0.2 GPa0.03 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

37 MPa5.4 ksi
25 MPa3.6 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

34 MPa4.9 ksi
—

Elongation at Break

110%
500%

Compressive Strength

40 MPa5.8 ksi
—

Compressive Modulus

1.4 GPa0.2 Msi
—

Flexural Strength

60 MPa8.7 ksi
—

Flexural Modulus

1.5 GPa0.22 Msi
0.19 GPa0.03 Msi

Shear Strength

33 MPa4.8 ksi
—

Izod Impact, Notched

145 J/m2.7 ft·lbf/in
—

Hardness, Shore D

78 Shore D
54 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

112 HRR
—

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.42

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.12 g/cm³0.08 lb/in³
1.97 g/cm³0.07 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

212°C414 °F
165°C329 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

50°C122 °F
0°C32 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.01%
0.03%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.01%
—

Refractive Index

1.43
1.355

Light Transmission

—
92%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.22 W/m·K0.13 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
1,100 J/kg·K0.26 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

65 µm/m·K36.1 µin/in·°F
130 µm/m·K72.2 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

135°C275 °F
130°C266 °F

Min Service Temperature

-240°C-400 °F
-50°C-58 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

126°C259 °F
50°C122 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

78°C172 °F
—

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

150°C302 °F
—

Limiting Oxygen Index

95%
70%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

180°C356 °F
150°C302 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω·m3.94×10²³ µΩ·in
—

Dielectric Strength

21 kV/mm533 V/mil
25 kV/mm635 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.5
6

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.014
0.06

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁸ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω
—

Same in both: Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

95 / 100
92 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

92 / 100
95 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

70 / 100
45 / 100

Weldability

20 / 100
85 / 100

Formability (cold)

45 / 100
90 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

1.8%
3%

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

290°C554 °F
250°C482 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

120°C248 °F
60°C140 °F

Melt Flow Rate

—
15 g/10 min

Same in both: Polishability 55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

240 MJ/kg103,182 BTU/lb
230 MJ/kg98,882 BTU/lb

Embodied Water

400 L/kg47.9 gal/lb
350 L/kg41.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 13 kg CO₂/kg · Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

17 kN·m/kg
13 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

0.7 MN·m/kg
0.1 MN·m/kg

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePCTFE

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPCTFETHV
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Injection moldingYes—
Default conditionUnfilled—
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Chrome Plating (Plastic)Yes—
EMI Shielding CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Soft Touch CoatingYes—
Spray PaintingYes—
UV CoatingYes—

PCTFE vs THV — frequently asked

Is PCTFE stronger than THV?

Yes. PCTFE has a typical tensile strength of 37 MPa (5.37 ksi) against 25 MPa (3.63 ksi) for THV — about 48% more.

Which is cheaper, PCTFE or THV?

THV is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while PCTFE is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, PCTFE or THV?

PCTFE. Its machinability rates very good (70/100) against fair (45/100) for THV; for welding the order is THV first (excellent, 85/100) then PCTFE (poor, 20/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PCTFE and THV side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.