FabDigitFabDigit

PCTFE vs PTFE-Bronze40

Polymer · grade comparison

PCTFE and PTFE-Bronze40 are both polymer grades. PCTFE is the stronger of the two: yield strength 34 MPa (4.93 ksi) against 11 MPa (1.6 ksi) for PTFE-Bronze40, about 3.1 times as much; tensile strength follows at 37 MPa (5.37 ksi) vs 16 MPa (2.32 ksi). In exchange, PTFE-Bronze40 is the more ductile: elongation 150% versus 110% for PCTFE, and PCTFE is harder (78 Shore D vs 65 Shore D). PCTFE is lighter (2.12 g/cm³ vs 3.1 g/cm³ for PTFE-Bronze40) and PCTFE is stiffer (1.5 GPa vs 1.1 GPa). On the shop floor, PCTFE welds better (poor vs not recommended) and PTFE-Bronze40 sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than PCTFE (specialty, $$$$$).

PCTFEChoose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

PTFE-Bronze40Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

PCTFE vs PTFE-Bronze40: properties

PCTFEPTFE-Bronze40

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

1.5 GPa0.22 Msi
1.1 GPa0.16 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

37 MPa5.4 ksi
16 MPa2.3 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

34 MPa4.9 ksi
11 MPa1.6 ksi

Elongation at Break

110%
150%

Compressive Strength

40 MPa5.8 ksi
22 MPa3.2 ksi

Compressive Modulus

1.4 GPa0.2 Msi
1.2 GPa0.17 Msi

Flexural Strength

60 MPa8.7 ksi
16 MPa2.3 ksi

Flexural Modulus

1.5 GPa0.22 Msi
1.2 GPa0.17 Msi

Shear Strength

33 MPa4.8 ksi
14 MPa2 ksi

Izod Impact, Notched

145 J/m2.7 ft·lbf/in
70 J/m1.3 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

78 Shore D
65 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

112 HRR
70 HRR

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
2 MPa·√m1.8 ksi·√in

Hardness, Shore A

—
98 Shore A

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.42

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.12 g/cm³0.08 lb/in³
3.1 g/cm³0.11 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

212°C414 °F
327°C621 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

50°C122 °F
-97°C-143 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.01%
0.04%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.01%
—

Refractive Index

1.43
—

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.22 W/m·K0.13 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.45 W/m·K0.26 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
760 J/kg·K0.18 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

65 µm/m·K36.1 µin/in·°F
90 µm/m·K50 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

135°C275 °F
250°C482 °F

Min Service Temperature

-240°C-400 °F
-190°C-310 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

126°C259 °F
145°C293 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

78°C172 °F
80°C176 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

150°C302 °F
—

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

180°C356 °F
300°C572 °F

Same in both: Limiting Oxygen Index 95%

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω·m3.94×10²³ µΩ·in
10,000 Ω·m3.94×10¹¹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

21 kV/mm533 V/mil
—

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.5
—

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.014
—

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁸ Ω·cm
1,000,000 Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω
—

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

600 V
—

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

95 / 100
70 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

92 / 100
95 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Weldability

20 / 100
5 / 100

Formability (cold)

45 / 100
15 / 100

Polishability

55 / 100
30 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

1.8%
2.2%

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

290°C554 °F
375°C707 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

120°C248 °F
—

Same in both: Machinability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

240 MJ/kg103,182 BTU/lb
145 MJ/kg62,339 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

13 kg CO₂/kg
7 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

400 L/kg47.9 gal/lb
—

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

17 kN·m/kg
5 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

0.7 MN·m/kg
0.4 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

385 kJ/m³
55 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

0.1 mm²/s
0.2 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePCTFEPTFE-Bronze40

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPCTFEPTFE-Bronze40
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Injection moldingYes—
Default conditionUnfilled—
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Chrome Plating (Plastic)Yes—
EMI Shielding CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Soft Touch CoatingYes—
Spray PaintingYes—
UV CoatingYes—

PCTFE vs PTFE-Bronze40 — frequently asked

Is PCTFE stronger than PTFE-Bronze40?

Yes. PCTFE has a typical yield strength of 34 MPa (4.93 ksi) against 11 MPa (1.6 ksi) for PTFE-Bronze40 — about 3.1 times as much. Tensile strength is 37 MPa (5.37 ksi) vs 16 MPa (2.32 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PCTFE or PTFE-Bronze40?

PTFE-Bronze40 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while PCTFE is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, PCTFE or PTFE-Bronze40?

PCTFE. Its weldability rates poor (20/100) against not recommended (5/100) for PTFE-Bronze40.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PCTFE and PTFE-Bronze40 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.