FabDigitFabDigit

PCL vs PLA

Polymer · grade comparison

PCL and PLA are both polymer grades. PLA is the stronger of the two: yield strength 48 MPa (6.96 ksi) against 13 MPa (1.89 ksi) for PCL, about 3.7 times as much; tensile strength follows at 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) vs 22 MPa (3.19 ksi). In exchange, PCL is the more ductile: elongation 600% versus 5% for PLA, and PLA is harder (83 Shore D vs 53 Shore D). PCL is lighter (1.15 g/cm³ vs 1.24 g/cm³ for PLA) and PLA is stiffer (3.4 GPa vs 0.35 GPa). On the shop floor, PLA machines more easily (good vs poor), PCL welds better (excellent vs very good), and PLA sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than PCL (premium, $$$).

PCLChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

PLAChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

PCL vs PLA: properties

PCLPLA

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.35 GPa0.05 Msi
3.4 GPa0.49 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.44
0.36

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

22 MPa3.2 ksi
50 MPa7.3 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

13 MPa1.9 ksi
48 MPa7 ksi

Elongation at Break

600%
5%

Flexural Strength

12 MPa1.7 ksi
83 MPa12 ksi

Flexural Modulus

0.32 GPa0.05 Msi
3.5 GPa0.51 Msi

Izod Impact, Notched

120 J/m2.2 ft·lbf/in
22 J/m0.41 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore A

95 Shore A
—

Hardness, Shore D

53 Shore D
83 Shore D

Shear Modulus

—
1.3 GPa0.18 Msi

Bulk Modulus

—
4 GPa0.58 Msi

Compressive Strength

—
70 MPa10.2 ksi

Compressive Modulus

—
3.2 GPa0.46 Msi

Shear Strength

—
45 MPa6.5 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
2.2 MPa·√m2 ksi·√in

Hardness, Rockwell R

—
105 HRR

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.15 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.24 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

60°C140 °F
160°C320 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

-60°C-76 °F
60°C140 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.4%
0.3%

Refractive Index

1.47
1.46

Light Transmission

—
88%

Same in both: Water Absorption (Saturation) 1%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.13 W/m·K0.08 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

170 µm/m·K94.4 µin/in·°F
70 µm/m·K38.9 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

40°C104 °F
50°C122 °F

Min Service Temperature

-60°C-76 °F
-20°C-4 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

45°C113 °F
55°C131 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

55°C131 °F
58°C136 °F

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

55°C131 °F
65°C149 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

—
50°C122 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 1,800 J/kg·K0.43 BTU/lb·°F · Limiting Oxygen Index 20%

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in
1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm

Dielectric Strength

—
19 kV/mm483 V/mil

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

—
0.013

Surface Resistivity

—
1×10¹⁶ Ω

Same in both: Dielectric Constant (1 MHz) 3

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

UV / Weathering Resistance

35 / 100
40 / 100

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 55 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

25 / 100
60 / 100

Weldability

90 / 100
70 / 100

Formability (cold)

95 / 100
25 / 100

Polishability

30 / 100
55 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

2%
0.4%

Melt Flow Rate

7 g/10 min
6 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

110°C230 °F
205°C401 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

20°C68 °F
55°C131 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

90 MJ/kg38,693 BTU/lb
50 MJ/kg21,496 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.5 kg CO₂/kg
1.8 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

0%
2%

Embodied Water

—
350 L/kg41.9 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

19 kN·m/kg
40 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

0.3 MN·m/kg
2.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

241 kJ/m³
339 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePCLPLA

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPCLPLA
3D printing—Yes
Default condition—Standard
Relative cost$$$ Premium$ Budget
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——
Conductive Coating—Yes
Dyeing (Nylon)—Yes
EMI Shielding Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Primer Coating—Yes
Soft Touch Coating—Yes
Tinted Coating—Yes
UV Coating—Yes
Vacuum Metallization—Yes
Waterproof Coating—Yes

PCL vs PLA — frequently asked

Is PLA stronger than PCL?

Yes. PLA has a typical yield strength of 48 MPa (6.96 ksi) against 13 MPa (1.89 ksi) for PCL — about 3.7 times as much. Tensile strength is 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) vs 22 MPa (3.19 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PCL or PLA?

PLA is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while PCL is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, PCL or PLA?

PLA. Its machinability rates good (60/100) against poor (25/100) for PCL; for welding the order is PCL first (excellent, 90/100) then PLA (very good, 70/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PCL and PLA side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.