FabDigitFabDigit

PETG vs PLA

Polymer · grade comparison

PETG and PLA are both polymer grades, both multipurpose plastic. Both yield at about 50 MPa — strength does not separate them. PETG is the more ductile: elongation 120% versus 5% for PLA, and PLA is harder (83 Shore D vs 78 Shore D). PLA is stiffer (3.4 GPa vs 2.1 GPa) and PETG runs hotter in service (63°C vs 50°C continuous). On the shop floor, PETG welds better (80 vs 70 out of 100).

PETGChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

PETG vs PLA: properties

PETGPLA

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

2.1 GPa0.3 Msi
3.4 GPa0.49 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.77 GPa0.11 Msi
1.3 GPa0.18 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.4
0.36

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

50 MPa7.3 ksi
48 MPa7 ksi

Elongation at Break

120%
5%

Compressive Strength

60 MPa8.7 ksi
70 MPa10.2 ksi

Flexural Strength

70 MPa10.2 ksi
83 MPa12 ksi

Flexural Modulus

2.1 GPa0.3 Msi
3.5 GPa0.51 Msi

Izod Impact, Notched

95 J/m1.8 ft·lbf/in
22 J/m0.41 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

78 Shore D
83 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

115 HRR
105 HRR

Bulk Modulus

—
4 GPa0.58 Msi

Compressive Modulus

—
3.2 GPa0.46 Msi

Shear Strength

—
45 MPa6.5 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
2.2 MPa·√m2 ksi·√in

Same in both: Tensile Strength (Ultimate) 50 MPa7.3 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.27 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.24 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

80°C176 °F
60°C140 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.13%
0.3%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.5%
1%

Refractive Index

1.57
1.46

Light Transmission

89%
88%

Melting Temperature (Tm)

—
160°C320 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.13 W/m·K0.08 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,200 J/kg·K0.29 BTU/lb·°F
1,800 J/kg·K0.43 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

68 µm/m·K37.8 µin/in·°F
70 µm/m·K38.9 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

63°C145 °F
50°C122 °F

Min Service Temperature

-40°C-40 °F
-20°C-4 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

70°C158 °F
55°C131 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

64°C147 °F
50°C122 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

82°C180 °F
58°C136 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

23%
20%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

75°C167 °F
65°C149 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

16 kV/mm406 V/mil
19 kV/mm483 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.8
3

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.02
0.013

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm · Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁶ Ω

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

85 / 100
55 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

45 / 100
40 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

65 / 100
60 / 100

Weldability

80 / 100
70 / 100

Formability (cold)

88 / 100
25 / 100

Polishability

72 / 100
55 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.35%
0.4%

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

245°C473 °F
205°C401 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

25°C77 °F
55°C131 °F

Melt Flow Rate

—
6 g/10 min

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

84 MJ/kg36,114 BTU/lb
50 MJ/kg21,496 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.2 kg CO₂/kg
1.8 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

210 L/kg25.2 gal/lb
350 L/kg41.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

0%
2%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

39 kN·m/kg
40 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

1.7 MN·m/kg
2.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

595 kJ/m³
339 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePETGPLA

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPETGPLA
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Injection moldingYes—
Default conditionUnfilledStandard
Relative cost$ Budget$ Budget
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Chrome Plating (Plastic)Yes—
Spray PaintingYes—

Both are offered for 3D printing. They share 10 finishes: Conductive Coating, Dyeing (Nylon), EMI Shielding Coating, Painting, Primer Coating, Soft Touch Coating, Tinted Coating, UV Coating, Vacuum Metallization, Waterproof Coating.

PETG vs PLA — frequently asked

What is the difference between PETG and PLA?

PETG and PLA are both polymer grades, both multipurpose plastic. Both yield at about 50 MPa — strength does not separate them. PETG is the more ductile: elongation 120% versus 5% for PLA, and PLA is harder (83 Shore D vs 78 Shore D).

Which is cheaper, PETG or PLA?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($, budget); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, PETG or PLA?

PETG, by a small margin. Both rate good for machinability — 65/100 against 60/100 for PLA; for welding the order is PETG first (very good, 80/100) then PLA (very good, 70/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PETG and PLA side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.