FabDigitFabDigit

PCL vs PETG

Polymer · grade comparison

PCL and PETG are both polymer grades. PETG is the stronger of the two: yield strength 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) against 13 MPa (1.89 ksi) for PCL, about 3.8 times as much; tensile strength follows at 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) vs 22 MPa (3.19 ksi). In exchange, PCL is the more ductile: elongation 600% versus 120% for PETG, and PETG is harder (78 Shore D vs 53 Shore D). PCL is lighter (1.15 g/cm³ vs 1.27 g/cm³ for PETG) and PETG is stiffer (2.1 GPa vs 0.35 GPa). On the shop floor, PETG machines more easily (good vs poor), PCL welds better (excellent vs very good), and PETG sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than PCL (premium, $$$).

PCLChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

PETGChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

PCL vs PETG: properties

PCLPETG

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.35 GPa0.05 Msi
2.1 GPa0.3 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.44
0.4

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

22 MPa3.2 ksi
50 MPa7.3 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

13 MPa1.9 ksi
50 MPa7.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

600%
120%

Flexural Strength

12 MPa1.7 ksi
70 MPa10.2 ksi

Flexural Modulus

0.32 GPa0.05 Msi
2.1 GPa0.3 Msi

Izod Impact, Notched

120 J/m2.2 ft·lbf/in
95 J/m1.8 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore A

95 Shore A
—

Hardness, Shore D

53 Shore D
78 Shore D

Shear Modulus

—
0.77 GPa0.11 Msi

Compressive Strength

—
60 MPa8.7 ksi

Hardness, Rockwell R

—
115 HRR

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.15 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.27 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

60°C140 °F
—

Glass Transition (Tg)

-60°C-76 °F
80°C176 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.4%
0.13%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

1%
0.5%

Refractive Index

1.47
1.57

Light Transmission

—
89%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Specific Heat Capacity

1,800 J/kg·K0.43 BTU/lb·°F
1,200 J/kg·K0.29 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

170 µm/m·K94.4 µin/in·°F
68 µm/m·K37.8 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

40°C104 °F
63°C145 °F

Min Service Temperature

-60°C-76 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

45°C113 °F
70°C158 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

55°C131 °F
82°C180 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

20%
23%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

55°C131 °F
75°C167 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

—
64°C147 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in
1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3
2.8

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm

Dielectric Strength

—
16 kV/mm406 V/mil

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

—
0.02

Surface Resistivity

—
1×10¹⁶ Ω

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

55 / 100
85 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

35 / 100
45 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

25 / 100
65 / 100

Weldability

90 / 100
80 / 100

Formability (cold)

95 / 100
88 / 100

Polishability

30 / 100
72 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

2%
0.35%

Melt Flow Rate

7 g/10 min
—

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

110°C230 °F
245°C473 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

20°C68 °F
25°C77 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

90 MJ/kg38,693 BTU/lb
84 MJ/kg36,114 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.5 kg CO₂/kg
3.2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

—
210 L/kg25.2 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

19 kN·m/kg
39 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

0.3 MN·m/kg
1.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

241 kJ/m³
595 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePETGPCL

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPCLPETG
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Injection molding—Yes
3D printing—Yes
Default condition—Unfilled
Relative cost$$$ Premium$ Budget
Min. machined wall—0.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 0.8 µm
Chrome Plating (Plastic)—Yes
Conductive Coating—Yes
Dyeing (Nylon)—Yes
EMI Shielding Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Primer Coating—Yes
Soft Touch Coating—Yes
Spray Painting—Yes
Tinted Coating—Yes
UV Coating—Yes
Vacuum Metallization—Yes
Waterproof Coating—Yes

PCL vs PETG — frequently asked

Is PETG stronger than PCL?

Yes. PETG has a typical yield strength of 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) against 13 MPa (1.89 ksi) for PCL — about 3.8 times as much. Tensile strength is 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) vs 22 MPa (3.19 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PCL or PETG?

PETG is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while PCL is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, PCL or PETG?

PETG. Its machinability rates good (65/100) against poor (25/100) for PCL; for welding the order is PCL first (excellent, 90/100) then PETG (very good, 80/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PCL and PETG side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.