FabDigitFabDigit

ABS vs PLA

Polymer · grade comparison

ABS and PLA are both polymer grades, both multipurpose plastic. PLA is the stronger of the two: yield strength 48 MPa (6.96 ksi) against 42 MPa (6.09 ksi) for ABS, about 14% more; tensile strength follows at 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) vs 43 MPa (6.24 ksi). In exchange, ABS is the more ductile: elongation 25% versus 5% for PLA, and PLA is harder (83 Shore D vs 78 Shore D). ABS is lighter (1.04 g/cm³ vs 1.24 g/cm³ for PLA) and PLA is stiffer (3.4 GPa vs 2.3 GPa). On the shop floor, ABS machines more easily (very good vs good).

ABSChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

PLAChoose it when strength drives the design.

ABS vs PLA: properties

ABSPLA

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

2.3 GPa0.33 Msi
3.4 GPa0.49 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.85 GPa0.12 Msi
1.3 GPa0.18 Msi

Bulk Modulus

4 GPa0.51 Msi
4 GPa0.58 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.35
0.36

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

43 MPa6.2 ksi
50 MPa7.3 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

42 MPa6.1 ksi
48 MPa7 ksi

Elongation at Break

25%
5%

Compressive Strength

65 MPa9.4 ksi
70 MPa10.2 ksi

Compressive Modulus

2.2 GPa0.32 Msi
3.2 GPa0.46 Msi

Flexural Strength

70 MPa10.2 ksi
83 MPa12 ksi

Flexural Modulus

2.3 GPa0.33 Msi
3.5 GPa0.51 Msi

Shear Strength

34 MPa4.9 ksi
45 MPa6.5 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

3 MPa·√m2.7 ksi·√in
2.2 MPa·√m2 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

200 J/m3.7 ft·lbf/in
22 J/m0.41 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

78 Shore D
83 Shore D

Same in both: Hardness, Rockwell R 105 HRR

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.04 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.24 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

105°C221 °F
60°C140 °F

Melting Temperature (Tm)

—
160°C320 °F

Refractive Index

—
1.46

Light Transmission

—
88%

Same in both: Water Absorption (24 h) 0.3% · Water Absorption (Saturation) 1%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.17 W/m·K0.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.13 W/m·K0.08 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,450 J/kg·K0.35 BTU/lb·°F
1,800 J/kg·K0.43 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

90 µm/m·K50 µin/in·°F
70 µm/m·K38.9 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

75°C167 °F
50°C122 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

95°C203 °F
55°C131 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

85°C185 °F
50°C122 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

100°C212 °F
58°C136 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

19%
20%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

95°C203 °F
65°C149 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -20°C-4 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in
1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

16 kV/mm406 V/mil
19 kV/mm483 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.9
3

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.009
0.013

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω
1×10¹⁶ Ω

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

600 V
—

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

68 / 100
55 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

22 / 100
40 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

80 / 100
60 / 100

Weldability

78 / 100
70 / 100

Formability (cold)

82 / 100
25 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
55 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.55%
0.4%

Melt Flow Rate

20 g/10 min
6 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

235°C455 °F
205°C401 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

60°C140 °F
55°C131 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

95 MJ/kg40,843 BTU/lb
50 MJ/kg21,496 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.8 kg CO₂/kg
1.8 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

200 L/kg24 gal/lb
350 L/kg41.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

5%
2%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

41 kN·m/kg
40 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2.2 MN·m/kg
2.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

383 kJ/m³
339 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleABSPLA

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityABSPLA
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Injection moldingYes—
Default conditionUnfilledStandard
Relative cost$ Budget$ Budget
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Chrome Plating (Plastic)Yes—
Spray PaintingYes—

Both are offered for 3D printing. They share 10 finishes: Conductive Coating, Dyeing (Nylon), EMI Shielding Coating, Painting, Primer Coating, Soft Touch Coating, Tinted Coating, UV Coating, Vacuum Metallization, Waterproof Coating.

ABS vs PLA — frequently asked

Is PLA stronger than ABS?

Yes. PLA has a typical yield strength of 48 MPa (6.96 ksi) against 42 MPa (6.09 ksi) for ABS — about 14% more. Tensile strength is 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) vs 43 MPa (6.24 ksi).

Which is cheaper, ABS or PLA?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($, budget); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, ABS or PLA?

ABS. Its machinability rates very good (80/100) against good (60/100) for PLA; for welding the order is ABS first (very good, 78/100) then PLA (very good, 70/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in ABS and PLA side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.