FabDigitFabDigit

PA11 vs PA6-3-T

Polymer · grade comparison

PA11 and PA6-3-T are both polymer grades. PA6-3-T is the stronger of the two: yield strength 78 MPa (11.3 ksi) against 40 MPa (5.8 ksi) for PA11, about 95% more; tensile strength follows at 80 MPa (11.6 ksi) vs 48 MPa (6.96 ksi). PA6-3-T is the more ductile: elongation 70% versus 45% for PA11, and PA6-3-T is harder (83 Shore D vs 75 Shore D). PA11 is lighter (1.03 g/cm³ vs 1.12 g/cm³ for PA6-3-T) and PA6-3-T is stiffer (2.9 GPa vs 1.6 GPa). On the shop floor, PA11 sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than PA6-3-T (high, $$$$).

PA11Choose it when weight is the constraint, or when cost is the deciding factor.

PA6-3-TChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

PA11 vs PA6-3-T: properties

PA11PA6-3-T

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

1.6 GPa0.23 Msi
2.9 GPa0.42 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.55 GPa0.08 Msi
1.1 GPa0.15 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

48 MPa7 ksi
80 MPa11.6 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

40 MPa5.8 ksi
78 MPa11.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

45%
70%

Compressive Strength

50 MPa7.3 ksi
95 MPa13.8 ksi

Flexural Strength

47 MPa6.8 ksi
110 MPa16 ksi

Flexural Modulus

1.4 GPa0.2 Msi
2.8 GPa0.41 Msi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

3.5 MPa·√m3.2 ksi·√in
—

Hardness, Shore D

75 Shore D
83 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

105 HRR
120 HRR

Hardness, Rockwell M

—
90 HRM

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.4 · Izod Impact, Notched 55 J/m1 ft·lbf/in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.03 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.12 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

188°C370 °F
—

Glass Transition (Tg)

46°C115 °F
150°C302 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.3%
0.4%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

1.9%
3%

Refractive Index

—
1.566

Light Transmission

—
90%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.25 W/m·K0.14 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.23 W/m·K0.13 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,800 J/kg·K0.43 BTU/lb·°F
1,600 J/kg·K0.38 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

120 µm/m·K66.7 µin/in·°F
70 µm/m·K38.9 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

85°C185 °F
110°C230 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

180°C356 °F
145°C293 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

50°C122 °F
128°C262 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

160°C320 °F
148°C298 °F

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

130°C266 °F
145°C293 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -40°C-40 °F · Limiting Oxygen Index 25%

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in
1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

23 kV/mm584 V/mil
30 kV/mm762 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.2
3.1

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.04
0.02

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω
1×10¹⁴ Ω

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

—
600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 85 / 100 · UV / Weathering Resistance 55 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

65 / 100
72 / 100

Weldability

70 / 100
65 / 100

Polishability

55 / 100
88 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

1.2%
0.6%

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

235°C455 °F
275°C527 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

60°C140 °F
80°C176 °F

Formability (cold)

—
60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

75 MJ/kg32,244 BTU/lb
130 MJ/kg55,890 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5 kg CO₂/kg
8 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

40%
0%

Embodied Water

—
350 L/kg41.9 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

47 kN·m/kg
71 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

1.6 MN·m/kg
2.6 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

500 kJ/m³
1,049 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePA11PA6-3-T

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPA11PA6-3-T
3D printingYes—
Default conditionUnfilled—
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——
Conductive CoatingYes—
Dyeing (Nylon)Yes—
EMI Shielding CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Primer CoatingYes—
Soft Touch CoatingYes—
Tinted CoatingYes—
UV CoatingYes—
Vacuum MetallizationYes—
Waterproof CoatingYes—

PA11 vs PA6-3-T — frequently asked

Is PA6-3-T stronger than PA11?

Yes. PA6-3-T has a typical yield strength of 78 MPa (11.3 ksi) against 40 MPa (5.8 ksi) for PA11 — about 95% more. Tensile strength is 80 MPa (11.6 ksi) vs 48 MPa (6.96 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PA11 or PA6-3-T?

PA11 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while PA6-3-T is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, PA11 or PA6-3-T?

PA6-3-T. Its machinability rates very good (72/100) against good (65/100) for PA11; for welding the order is PA11 first (very good, 70/100) then PA6-3-T (good, 65/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PA11 and PA6-3-T side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.