FabDigitFabDigit

MFA vs PCTFE

Polymer · grade comparison

MFA and PCTFE are both polymer grades. PCTFE is the stronger of the two: yield strength 34 MPa (4.93 ksi) against 13 MPa (1.89 ksi) for MFA, about 162% more; tensile strength follows at 37 MPa (5.37 ksi) vs 28 MPa (4.06 ksi). In exchange, MFA is the more ductile: elongation 400% versus 110% for PCTFE, and PCTFE is harder (78 Shore D vs 58 Shore D). PCTFE is stiffer (1.5 GPa vs 0.55 GPa) and MFA runs hotter in service (240°C vs 135°C continuous). On the shop floor, PCTFE machines more easily (very good vs good), MFA welds better (very good vs poor), and MFA sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than PCTFE (specialty, $$$$$).

MFAChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

PCTFEChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

MFA vs PCTFE: properties

MFAPCTFE

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.55 GPa0.08 Msi
1.5 GPa0.22 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.44
0.42

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

28 MPa4.1 ksi
37 MPa5.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

13 MPa1.9 ksi
34 MPa4.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

400%
110%

Compressive Strength

14 MPa2 ksi
40 MPa5.8 ksi

Flexural Modulus

0.6 GPa0.09 Msi
1.5 GPa0.22 Msi

Hardness, Shore D

58 Shore D
78 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

60 HRR
112 HRR

Compressive Modulus

—
1.4 GPa0.2 Msi

Flexural Strength

—
60 MPa8.7 ksi

Shear Strength

—
33 MPa4.8 ksi

Izod Impact, Notched

—
145 J/m2.7 ft·lbf/in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.14 g/cm³0.08 lb/in³
2.12 g/cm³0.08 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

285°C545 °F
212°C414 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.02%
0.01%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.03%
0.01%

Refractive Index

1.355
1.43

Light Transmission

90%
—

Glass Transition (Tg)

—
50°C122 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.21 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.22 W/m·K0.13 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,050 J/kg·K0.25 BTU/lb·°F
900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

130 µm/m·K72.2 µin/in·°F
65 µm/m·K36.1 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

240°C464 °F
135°C275 °F

Min Service Temperature

-190°C-310 °F
-240°C-400 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

68°C154 °F
126°C259 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

46°C115 °F
78°C172 °F

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

260°C500 °F
180°C356 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

—
150°C302 °F

Same in both: Limiting Oxygen Index 95%

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

24 kV/mm610 V/mil
21 kV/mm533 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.1
2.5

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

3×10⁻⁴
0.014

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁷ Ω
1×10¹⁶ Ω

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹⁶ Ω·m3.94×10²³ µΩ·in · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁸ Ω·cm · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

98 / 100
95 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

98 / 100
92 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

55 / 100
70 / 100

Weldability

70 / 100
20 / 100

Formability (cold)

80 / 100
45 / 100

Polishability

40 / 100
55 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

4%
1.8%

Melt Flow Rate

10 g/10 min
—

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

350°C662 °F
290°C554 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

170°C338 °F
120°C248 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

250 MJ/kg107,481 BTU/lb
240 MJ/kg103,182 BTU/lb

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 13 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 400 L/kg47.9 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

13 kN·m/kg
17 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

0.3 MN·m/kg
0.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

154 kJ/m³
385 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePCTFEMFA

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityMFAPCTFE
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Injection molding—Yes
Default condition—Unfilled
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$$ Specialty
Min. machined wall—0.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 0.8 µm
Chrome Plating (Plastic)—Yes
EMI Shielding Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Soft Touch Coating—Yes
Spray Painting—Yes
UV Coating—Yes

MFA vs PCTFE — frequently asked

Is PCTFE stronger than MFA?

Yes. PCTFE has a typical yield strength of 34 MPa (4.93 ksi) against 13 MPa (1.89 ksi) for MFA — about 162% more. Tensile strength is 37 MPa (5.37 ksi) vs 28 MPa (4.06 ksi).

Which is cheaper, MFA or PCTFE?

MFA is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while PCTFE is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, MFA or PCTFE?

PCTFE. Its machinability rates very good (70/100) against good (55/100) for MFA; for welding the order is MFA first (very good, 70/100) then PCTFE (poor, 20/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in MFA and PCTFE side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.