FabDigitFabDigit

MDPE vs UHMW-PE

Polymer · grade comparison

MDPE and UHMW-PE are both polymer grades. UHMW-PE is the stronger of the two: yield strength 21 MPa (3.05 ksi) against 19 MPa (2.76 ksi) for MDPE, about 11% more; tensile strength follows at 40 MPa (5.8 ksi) vs 24 MPa (3.48 ksi). In exchange, MDPE is the more ductile: elongation 700% versus 350% for UHMW-PE, and UHMW-PE is harder (64 Shore D vs 58 Shore D). UHMW-PE runs hotter in service (80°C vs 65°C continuous). On the shop floor, UHMW-PE machines more easily (very good vs good), MDPE welds better (excellent vs poor), and MDPE sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than UHMW-PE (standard, $$).

MDPEChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when it will be welded.

UHMW-PEChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

MDPE vs UHMW-PE: properties

MDPEUHMW-PE

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.75 GPa0.11 Msi
0.72 GPa0.1 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.26 GPa0.04 Msi
0.25 GPa0.04 Msi

Bulk Modulus

2 GPa0.29 Msi
—

Poisson's Ratio

0.44
0.46

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

24 MPa3.5 ksi
40 MPa5.8 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

19 MPa2.8 ksi
21 MPa3 ksi

Elongation at Break

700%
350%

Compressive Strength

19 MPa2.8 ksi
20 MPa2.9 ksi

Compressive Modulus

0.7 GPa0.1 Msi
0.6 GPa0.09 Msi

Flexural Strength

22 MPa3.2 ksi
25 MPa3.6 ksi

Flexural Modulus

0.72 GPa0.1 Msi
0.75 GPa0.11 Msi

Shear Strength

18 MPa2.6 ksi
22 MPa3.2 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

3 MPa·√m2.7 ksi·√in
3.5 MPa·√m3.2 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

130 J/m2.4 ft·lbf/in
1,300 J/m24.3 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

58 Shore D
64 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

45 HRR
50 HRR

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.93 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³
0.94 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

127°C261 °F
135°C275 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

-110°C-166 °F
-120°C-184 °F

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.03%
0.01%

Refractive Index

1.52
1.51

Light Transmission

45%
—

Same in both: Water Absorption (24 h) 0.01%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.4 W/m·K0.23 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.41 W/m·K0.24 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,900 J/kg·K0.45 BTU/lb·°F
1,840 J/kg·K0.44 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

170 µm/m·K94.4 µin/in·°F
200 µm/m·K111 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

65°C149 °F
80°C176 °F

Min Service Temperature

-60°C-76 °F
-200°C-328 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

74°C165 °F
80°C176 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

45°C113 °F
44°C111 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

115°C239 °F
80°C176 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

18%
17%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

90°C194 °F
110°C230 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in
1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

22 kV/mm559 V/mil
30 kV/mm762 V/mil

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω
1×10¹⁴ Ω

Same in both: Dielectric Constant (1 MHz) 2.3 · Dissipation Factor (1 MHz) 3×10⁻⁴ · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

UV / Weathering Resistance

25 / 100
30 / 100

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 90 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

55 / 100
75 / 100

Weldability

95 / 100
15 / 100

Formability (cold)

80 / 100
55 / 100

Polishability

30 / 100
25 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

2%
3%

Melt Flow Rate

0.9 g/10 min
—

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

210°C410 °F
200°C392 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

40°C104 °F
—

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

78 MJ/kg33,534 BTU/lb
85 MJ/kg36,543 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2 kg CO₂/kg
3.2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

90 L/kg10.8 gal/lb
100 L/kg12 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

5%
0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

26 kN·m/kg
43 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

241 kJ/m³
306 kJ/m³

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 0.8 MN·m/kg · Thermal Diffusivity 0.2 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleUHMW-PEMDPE

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityMDPEUHMW-PE
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Injection molding—Yes
Default condition—FDA
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall—0.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 0.8 µm
Chrome Plating (Plastic)—Yes
EMI Shielding Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Soft Touch Coating—Yes
Spray Painting—Yes
UV Coating—Yes

MDPE vs UHMW-PE — frequently asked

Is UHMW-PE stronger than MDPE?

Yes. UHMW-PE has a typical yield strength of 21 MPa (3.05 ksi) against 19 MPa (2.76 ksi) for MDPE — about 11% more. Tensile strength is 40 MPa (5.8 ksi) vs 24 MPa (3.48 ksi).

Which is cheaper, MDPE or UHMW-PE?

MDPE is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while UHMW-PE is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, MDPE or UHMW-PE?

UHMW-PE. Its machinability rates very good (75/100) against good (55/100) for MDPE; for welding the order is MDPE first (excellent, 95/100) then UHMW-PE (poor, 15/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in MDPE and UHMW-PE side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.