FabDigitFabDigit

HMWPE vs MDPE

Polymer · grade comparison

HMWPE and MDPE are both polymer grades. HMWPE is the stronger of the two: yield strength 24 MPa (3.48 ksi) against 19 MPa (2.76 ksi) for MDPE, about 26% more; tensile strength follows at 30 MPa (4.35 ksi) vs 24 MPa (3.48 ksi). HMWPE is harder — 65 Shore D against 58 Shore D for MDPE — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. HMWPE is stiffer (0.95 GPa vs 0.75 GPa) and HMWPE runs hotter in service (80°C vs 65°C continuous).

HMWPEChoose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

HMWPE vs MDPE: properties

HMWPEMDPE

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.95 GPa0.14 Msi
0.75 GPa0.11 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.35 GPa0.05 Msi
0.26 GPa0.04 Msi

Bulk Modulus

3 GPa0.38 Msi
2 GPa0.29 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

30 MPa4.4 ksi
24 MPa3.5 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

24 MPa3.5 ksi
19 MPa2.8 ksi

Compressive Strength

22 MPa3.2 ksi
19 MPa2.8 ksi

Compressive Modulus

0.9 GPa0.13 Msi
0.7 GPa0.1 Msi

Flexural Strength

26 MPa3.8 ksi
22 MPa3.2 ksi

Flexural Modulus

1.1 GPa0.15 Msi
0.72 GPa0.1 Msi

Shear Strength

20 MPa2.9 ksi
18 MPa2.6 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

2.8 MPa·√m2.5 ksi·√in
3 MPa·√m2.7 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

250 J/m4.7 ft·lbf/in
130 J/m2.4 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

65 Shore D
58 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

50 HRR
45 HRR

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.44 · Elongation at Break 700%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.95 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³
0.93 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

133°C271 °F
127°C261 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

-120°C-184 °F
-110°C-166 °F

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.02%
0.03%

Refractive Index

1.54
1.52

Light Transmission

—
45%

Same in both: Water Absorption (24 h) 0.01%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.45 W/m·K0.26 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.4 W/m·K0.23 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

160 µm/m·K88.9 µin/in·°F
170 µm/m·K94.4 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

80°C176 °F
65°C149 °F

Min Service Temperature

-100°C-148 °F
-60°C-76 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

77°C171 °F
74°C165 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

46°C115 °F
45°C113 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

125°C257 °F
115°C239 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

17%
18%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

110°C230 °F
90°C194 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 1,900 J/kg·K0.45 BTU/lb·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

24 kV/mm610 V/mil
22 kV/mm559 V/mil

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in · Dielectric Constant (1 MHz) 2.3 · Dissipation Factor (1 MHz) 3×10⁻⁴ · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm · Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

93 / 100
90 / 100

Same in both: UV / Weathering Resistance 25 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

62 / 100
55 / 100

Weldability

92 / 100
95 / 100

Formability (cold)

78 / 100
80 / 100

Polishability

25 / 100
30 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

2.5%
2%

Melt Flow Rate

0.1 g/10 min
0.9 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

215°C419 °F
210°C410 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

35°C95 °F
40°C104 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.1 kg CO₂/kg
2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

110 L/kg13.2 gal/lb
90 L/kg10.8 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

10%
5%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 78 MJ/kg33,534 BTU/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

32 kN·m/kg
26 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

1 MN·m/kg
0.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

303 kJ/m³
241 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.2 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleHMWPEMDPE

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityHMWPEMDPE
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$ Budget
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

HMWPE vs MDPE — frequently asked

Is HMWPE stronger than MDPE?

Yes. HMWPE has a typical yield strength of 24 MPa (3.48 ksi) against 19 MPa (2.76 ksi) for MDPE — about 26% more. Tensile strength is 30 MPa (4.35 ksi) vs 24 MPa (3.48 ksi).

Which is cheaper, HMWPE or MDPE?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($, budget); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, HMWPE or MDPE?

HMWPE, by a small margin. Both rate good for machinability — 62/100 against 55/100 for MDPE.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in HMWPE and MDPE side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.