FabDigitFabDigit

HDPE vs TPA (PEBA)

Polymer · grade comparison

HDPE and TPA (PEBA) are both polymer grades. HDPE is the stronger of the two: yield strength 26 MPa (3.77 ksi) against 20 MPa (2.9 ksi) for TPA (PEBA), about 30% more. HDPE is the more ductile: elongation 600% versus 430% for TPA (PEBA), and HDPE is harder (65 Shore D vs 60 Shore D). HDPE is lighter (0.96 g/cm³ vs 1.01 g/cm³ for TPA (PEBA)) and HDPE is stiffer (1.1 GPa vs 0.22 GPa). On the shop floor, HDPE machines more easily (very good vs poor), HDPE welds better (excellent vs very good), and HDPE sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than TPA (PEBA) (high, $$$$).

HDPEChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

HDPE vs TPA (PEBA): properties

HDPETPA (PEBA)

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

1.1 GPa0.16 Msi
0.22 GPa0.03 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.4 GPa0.06 Msi
—

Bulk Modulus

3 GPa0.44 Msi
—

Poisson's Ratio

0.44
0.45

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

28 MPa4.1 ksi
52 MPa7.5 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

26 MPa3.8 ksi
20 MPa2.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

600%
430%

Compressive Strength

22 MPa3.2 ksi
—

Compressive Modulus

0.9 GPa0.13 Msi
—

Flexural Strength

27 MPa3.9 ksi
—

Flexural Modulus

1.2 GPa0.17 Msi
0.22 GPa0.03 Msi

Shear Strength

20 MPa2.9 ksi
—

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

2 MPa·√m1.8 ksi·√in
—

Izod Impact, Notched

90 J/m1.7 ft·lbf/in
950 J/m17.8 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

65 Shore D
60 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

55 HRR
—

Hardness, Shore A

—
95 Shore A

Tear Strength

—
120 kN/m685 lbf/in

Compression Set (22 h, 70 °C)

—
45%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.96 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³
1.01 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

132°C270 °F
165°C329 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

-110°C-166 °F
-55°C-67 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.01%
0.6%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.05%
1.5%

Refractive Index

1.54
—

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.48 W/m·K0.28 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.23 W/m·K0.13 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,900 J/kg·K0.45 BTU/lb·°F
2,000 J/kg·K0.48 BTU/lb·°F

Min Service Temperature

-80°C-112 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

76°C169 °F
55°C131 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

47°C117 °F
40°C104 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

76°C169 °F
115°C239 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

18%
21%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

110°C230 °F
120°C248 °F

Same in both: Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 150 µm/m·K83.3 µin/in·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 80°C176 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in
1×10¹⁰ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁷ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

24 kV/mm610 V/mil
20 kV/mm508 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.35
4

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

3×10⁻⁴
—

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm
1×10¹² Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω
1×10¹³ Ω

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

600 V
—

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

90 / 100
82 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

25 / 100
40 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

75 / 100
25 / 100

Weldability

95 / 100
75 / 100

Formability (cold)

70 / 100
85 / 100

Polishability

30 / 100
55 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

2%
1.2%

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

230°C446 °F
235°C455 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

40°C104 °F
30°C86 °F

Same in both: Melt Flow Rate 8 g/10 min

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

78 MJ/kg33,534 BTU/lb
140 MJ/kg60,189 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2 kg CO₂/kg
7.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

90 L/kg10.8 gal/lb
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

10%
0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

29 kN·m/kg
51 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

1.2 MN·m/kg
0.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

307 kJ/m³
909 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

0.3 mm²/s
0.1 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleHDPETPA (PEBA)

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityHDPETPA (PEBA)
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Injection moldingYes—
Default conditionFDA Compliant—
Relative cost$ Budget$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Chrome Plating (Plastic)Yes—
EMI Shielding CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Soft Touch CoatingYes—
Spray PaintingYes—
UV CoatingYes—

HDPE vs TPA (PEBA) — frequently asked

Is HDPE stronger than TPA (PEBA)?

Yes. HDPE has a typical yield strength of 26 MPa (3.77 ksi) against 20 MPa (2.9 ksi) for TPA (PEBA) — about 30% more. Tensile strength is 28 MPa (4.06 ksi) vs 52 MPa (7.54 ksi).

Which is cheaper, HDPE or TPA (PEBA)?

HDPE is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while TPA (PEBA) is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, HDPE or TPA (PEBA)?

HDPE. Its machinability rates very good (75/100) against poor (25/100) for TPA (PEBA); for welding the order is HDPE first (excellent, 95/100) then TPA (PEBA) (very good, 75/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in HDPE and TPA (PEBA) side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.