FabDigitFabDigit

G9 vs MF Moulding Compound

Polymer · grade comparison

G9 and MF Moulding Compound are both polymer grades. G9 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 220 MPa (31.9 ksi) against 62 MPa (8.99 ksi) for MF Moulding Compound, about 3.5 times as much. G9 is the more ductile: elongation 1.5% versus 0.7% for MF Moulding Compound. MF Moulding Compound is lighter (1.5 g/cm³ vs 1.95 g/cm³ for G9) and G9 is stiffer (18 GPa vs 8.5 GPa). On the shop floor, MF Moulding Compound machines more easily (fair vs poor) and MF Moulding Compound sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than G9 (high, $$$$).

G9Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

MF Moulding CompoundChoose it when weight is the constraint, or when the part is machined in volume.

G9 vs MF Moulding Compound: properties

G9MF Moulding Compound

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

18 GPa2.6 Msi
8.5 GPa1.2 Msi

Shear Modulus

6 GPa0.87 Msi
—

Poisson's Ratio

0.17
0.34

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

220 MPa31.9 ksi
62 MPa9 ksi

Elongation at Break

1.5%
0.7%

Compressive Strength

415 MPa60.2 ksi
240 MPa34.8 ksi

Flexural Strength

300 MPa43.5 ksi
100 MPa14.5 ksi

Flexural Modulus

17 GPa2.5 Msi
8.3 GPa1.2 Msi

Shear Strength

130 MPa18.9 ksi
60 MPa8.7 ksi

Izod Impact, Notched

600 J/m11.2 ft·lbf/in
15 J/m0.28 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Rockwell M

110 HRM
120 HRM

Compressive Modulus

—
9.5 GPa1.4 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.95 g/cm³0.07 lb/in³
1.5 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.7%
0.4%

Glass Transition (Tg)

—
220°C428 °F

Same in both: Water Absorption (Saturation) 1.6%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.35 W/m·K0.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.3 W/m·K0.17 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,100 J/kg·K0.26 BTU/lb·°F
1,600 J/kg·K0.38 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

17 µm/m·K9.4 µin/in·°F
40 µm/m·K22.2 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

150°C302 °F
130°C266 °F

Min Service Temperature

-60°C-76 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

45%
32%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

200°C392 °F
150°C302 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

—
195°C383 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

—
180°C356 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

13.8 kV/mm351 V/mil
13 kV/mm330 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

7.5
6.5

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.025
0.035

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹² Ω
1×10¹³ Ω

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹¹ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁸ µΩ·in · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹³ Ω·cm · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

72 / 100
62 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

55 / 100
70 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

28 / 100
45 / 100

Polishability

30 / 100
80 / 100

Weldability

—
0 / 100

Formability (cold)

—
5 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

—
0.8%

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

—
95°C203 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

—
155°C311 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

72 MJ/kg30,954 BTU/lb
85 MJ/kg36,543 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.2 kg CO₂/kg
4.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

—
180 L/kg21.6 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

113 kN·m/kg
41 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

9.2 MN·m/kg
5.7 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

0.2 mm²/s
0.1 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityG9MF Moulding Compound
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

G9 vs MF Moulding Compound — frequently asked

Is G9 stronger than MF Moulding Compound?

Yes. G9 has a typical tensile strength of 220 MPa (31.9 ksi) against 62 MPa (8.99 ksi) for MF Moulding Compound — about 3.5 times as much.

Which is cheaper, G9 or MF Moulding Compound?

MF Moulding Compound is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while G9 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, G9 or MF Moulding Compound?

MF Moulding Compound. Its machinability rates fair (45/100) against poor (28/100) for G9.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in G9 and MF Moulding Compound side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.