MF Moulding Compound vs PBI
Polymer · grade comparison
MF Moulding Compound and PBI are both polymer grades. PBI is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 160 MPa (23.2 ksi) against 62 MPa (8.99 ksi) for MF Moulding Compound, about 158% more. PBI is the more ductile: elongation 3% versus 0.7% for MF Moulding Compound. PBI is lighter (1.3 g/cm³ vs 1.5 g/cm³ for MF Moulding Compound) and MF Moulding Compound is stiffer (8.5 GPa vs 5.9 GPa). On the shop floor, MF Moulding Compound sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than PBI (specialty, $$$$$).
MF Moulding CompoundChoose it when cost is the deciding factor.
PBIChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.
MF Moulding Compound vs PBI: propertiesHow to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all polymer grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
How to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all polymer grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
Mechanical
Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.
Elastic (Young's) Modulus
Tensile Strength (Ultimate)
Elongation at Break
Compressive Strength
Compressive Modulus
Flexural Strength
Flexural Modulus
Shear Strength
Izod Impact, Notched
Hardness, Rockwell M
Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.34
Physical
Density and transition temperatures.
Density
Glass Transition (Tg)
Water Absorption (Saturation)
Same in both: Water Absorption (24 h) 0.4%
Thermal
How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.
Thermal Conductivity
Specific Heat Capacity
Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)
Max Service Temperature (continuous)
Min Service Temperature
Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa
Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa
Limiting Oxygen Index
Max Service Temperature (short-term)
Electrical
Conductivity and insulation.
Electrical Resistivity
Dielectric Strength
Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)
Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)
Volume Resistivity
Surface Resistivity
Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)
Chemical & Environmental
Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).
Corrosion Resistance
Same in both: UV / Weathering Resistance 70 / 100
Manufacturability
FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.
Machinability
Weldability
Polishability
Mold Shrinkage
Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)
Mold Temperature (typ.)
Same in both: Formability (cold) 5 / 100
Sustainability
Primary-production footprint per kilogram.
Embodied Energy (primary production)
Embodied Carbon (primary production)
Embodied Water
Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%
Common Calculations
Ratios derived from the values above.
Specific Strength (UTS / density)
Specific Stiffness (E / density)
Thermal Diffusivity
Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0
Strength versus weight
Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.
Manufacturing and finishing
| Capability | MF Moulding Compound | PBI |
|---|---|---|
| CNC machining | — | Yes |
| Sheet metal | — | Yes |
| Injection molding | — | Yes |
| Default condition | — | Unfilled |
| Relative cost | $$ Standard | $$$$$ Specialty |
| Min. machined wall | — | 0.5 mm |
| Best machined surface | — | Ra 0.8 µm |
| Chrome Plating (Plastic) | — | Yes |
| EMI Shielding Coating | — | Yes |
| Painting | — | Yes |
| Soft Touch Coating | — | Yes |
| Spray Painting | — | Yes |
| UV Coating | — | Yes |
MF Moulding Compound vs PBI — frequently asked
Is PBI stronger than MF Moulding Compound?
Yes. PBI has a typical tensile strength of 160 MPa (23.2 ksi) against 62 MPa (8.99 ksi) for MF Moulding Compound — about 158% more.
Which is cheaper, MF Moulding Compound or PBI?
MF Moulding Compound is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while PBI is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.
Which is easier to machine, MF Moulding Compound or PBI?
PBI, by a small margin. Both rate fair for machinability — 50/100 against 45/100 for MF Moulding Compound; for welding the order is PBI first (not recommended, 5/100) then MF Moulding Compound (not recommended, 0/100).
Ready to make it?
Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in MF Moulding Compound and PBI side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.
Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.