FabDigitFabDigit

EVA vs Ionomer

Polymer · grade comparison

EVA and Ionomer are both polymer grades. Ionomer is the stronger of the two: yield strength 15 MPa (2.18 ksi) against 7 MPa (1.02 ksi) for EVA, about 114% more; tensile strength follows at 30 MPa (4.35 ksi) vs 17 MPa (2.47 ksi). In exchange, EVA is the more ductile: elongation 780% versus 380% for Ionomer, and Ionomer is harder (60 Shore D vs 32 Shore D). Ionomer is stiffer (0.28 GPa vs 0.05 GPa) and EVA conducts heat better (0.34 W/m·K vs 0.24 W/m·K). On the shop floor, EVA sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than Ionomer (premium, $$$).

EVAChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when cost is the deciding factor.

IonomerChoose it when strength drives the design.

EVA vs Ionomer: properties

EVAIonomer

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.05 GPa0.01 Msi
0.28 GPa0.04 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.47
0.44

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

17 MPa2.5 ksi
30 MPa4.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

7 MPa1 ksi
15 MPa2.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

780%
380%

Flexural Modulus

0.04 GPa0.01 Msi
0.26 GPa0.04 Msi

Hardness, Shore A

90 Shore A
94 Shore A

Hardness, Shore D

32 Shore D
60 Shore D

Tear Strength

55 kN/m314 lbf/in
—

Shear Modulus

—
0.1 GPa0.01 Msi

Flexural Strength

—
12 MPa1.7 ksi

Izod Impact, Notched

—
900 J/m16.9 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Rockwell R

—
60 HRR

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.94 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³
0.95 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

86°C187 °F
90°C194 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

-30°C-22 °F
-25°C-13 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.08%
0.6%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.3%
1.4%

Refractive Index

1.49
1.51

Same in both: Light Transmission 88%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.34 W/m·K0.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.24 W/m·K0.14 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

2,300 J/kg·K0.55 BTU/lb·°F
2,200 J/kg·K0.53 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

200 µm/m·K111 µin/in·°F
140 µm/m·K77.8 µin/in·°F

Min Service Temperature

-60°C-76 °F
-100°C-148 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

44°C111 °F
46°C115 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

62°C144 °F
64°C147 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

19%
18%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

85°C185 °F
90°C194 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

—
33°C91 °F

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 65°C149 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in
1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

30 kV/mm762 V/mil
32 kV/mm813 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.9
2.5

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.03
0.01

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω
1×10¹⁵ Ω

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

82 / 100
78 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

35 / 100
40 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

25 / 100
30 / 100

Weldability

88 / 100
92 / 100

Formability (cold)

90 / 100
88 / 100

Polishability

30 / 100
70 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

1.3%
0.7%

Melt Flow Rate

2.5 g/10 min
5 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

165°C329 °F
220°C428 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

30°C86 °F
20°C68 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

78 MJ/kg33,534 BTU/lb
88 MJ/kg37,833 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.9 kg CO₂/kg
3 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

5%
0%

Same in both: Embodied Water 130 L/kg15.6 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

18 kN·m/kg
32 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

0.1 MN·m/kg
0.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

490 kJ/m³
402 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

0.2 mm²/s
0.1 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

1
0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleEVAIonomer

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityEVAIonomer
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

EVA vs Ionomer — frequently asked

Is Ionomer stronger than EVA?

Yes. Ionomer has a typical yield strength of 15 MPa (2.18 ksi) against 7 MPa (1.02 ksi) for EVA — about 114% more. Tensile strength is 30 MPa (4.35 ksi) vs 17 MPa (2.47 ksi).

Which is cheaper, EVA or Ionomer?

EVA is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while Ionomer is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, EVA or Ionomer?

Ionomer, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 30/100 against 25/100 for EVA.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in EVA and Ionomer side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.