FabDigitFabDigit

EBA vs EVA

Polymer · grade comparison

EBA and EVA are both polymer grades. EVA is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 17 MPa (2.47 ksi) against 8 MPa (1.16 ksi) for EBA, about 113% more. EVA is the more ductile: elongation 780% versus 700% for EBA. On the shop floor, EVA machines more easily (25 vs 15 out of 100) and EVA sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than EBA (standard, $$).

EVAChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

EBA vs EVA: properties

EBAEVA

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Poisson's Ratio

0.46
0.47

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

8 MPa1.2 ksi
17 MPa2.5 ksi

Elongation at Break

700%
780%

Flexural Modulus

0.05 GPa0.01 Msi
0.04 GPa0.01 Msi

Hardness, Shore A

88 Shore A
90 Shore A

Hardness, Shore D

33 Shore D
32 Shore D

Tear Strength

45 kN/m257 lbf/in
55 kN/m314 lbf/in

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

—
7 MPa1 ksi

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 0.05 GPa0.01 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.93 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³
0.94 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

95°C203 °F
86°C187 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

-45°C-49 °F
-30°C-22 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.03%
0.08%

Refractive Index

1.5
1.49

Light Transmission

85%
88%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

—
0.3%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.33 W/m·K0.19 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.34 W/m·K0.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

2,200 J/kg·K0.53 BTU/lb·°F
2,300 J/kg·K0.55 BTU/lb·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

70°C158 °F
65°C149 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

55°C131 °F
62°C144 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

19%
19%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

90°C194 °F
85°C185 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

—
44°C111 °F

Same in both: Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 200 µm/m·K111 µin/in·°F · Min Service Temperature -60°C-76 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in
1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

25 kV/mm635 V/mil
30 kV/mm762 V/mil

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.02
0.03

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω
1×10¹⁴ Ω

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

600 V
—

Same in both: Dielectric Constant (1 MHz) 2.9

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

85 / 100
82 / 100

Same in both: UV / Weathering Resistance 35 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

15 / 100
25 / 100

Weldability

92 / 100
88 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

2%
1.3%

Melt Flow Rate

6 g/10 min
2.5 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

190°C374 °F
165°C329 °F

Same in both: Formability (cold) 90 / 100 · Polishability 30 / 100 · Mold Temperature (typ.) 30°C86 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

82 MJ/kg35,254 BTU/lb
78 MJ/kg33,534 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.6 kg CO₂/kg
2.9 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

110 L/kg13.2 gal/lb
130 L/kg15.6 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

0%
5%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

9 kN·m/kg
18 kN·m/kg

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

0
1

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 0.1 MN·m/kg · Thermal Diffusivity 0.2 mm²/s

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleEVA

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityEBAEVA
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$ Budget
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

EBA vs EVA — frequently asked

Is EVA stronger than EBA?

Yes. EVA has a typical tensile strength of 17 MPa (2.47 ksi) against 8 MPa (1.16 ksi) for EBA — about 113% more.

Which is cheaper, EBA or EVA?

EVA is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while EBA is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, EBA or EVA?

EVA, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 25/100 against 15/100 for EBA.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in EBA and EVA side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.