FabDigitFabDigit

EVA Foam vs PU Foam

Polymer · grade comparison

EVA Foam and PU Foam are both polymer grades. EVA Foam is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 1 MPa (0.145 ksi) against 0.13 MPa (0.0189 ksi) for PU Foam, about 7.7 times as much. EVA Foam is the more ductile: elongation 200% versus 150% for PU Foam. PU Foam is lighter (0.03 g/cm³ vs 0.06 g/cm³ for EVA Foam) and EVA Foam is stiffer (0.01 GPa vs 2×10⁻⁴ GPa). On the shop floor, EVA Foam welds better (very good vs poor) and PU Foam sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than EVA Foam (standard, $$).

EVA FoamChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

PU FoamChoose it when weight is the constraint, or when the part sees heat.

EVA Foam vs PU Foam: properties

EVA FoamPU Foam

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.01 GPa7.25×10⁻⁴ Msi
2×10⁻⁴ GPa2.9×10⁻⁵ Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

1 MPa0.15 ksi
0.13 MPa0.02 ksi

Elongation at Break

200%
150%

Compressive Strength

0.1 MPa0.01 ksi
0.01 MPa7.25×10⁻⁴ ksi

Compressive Modulus

0 GPa5.8×10⁻⁴ Msi
—

Shear Strength

0.35 MPa0.05 ksi
—

Hardness, Shore A

30 Shore A
—

Tear Strength

2 kN/m8.6 lbf/in
0.3 kN/m1.7 lbf/in

Compression Set (22 h, 70 °C)

15%
5%

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.3

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.06 g/cm³0 lb/in³
0.03 g/cm³0 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

85°C185 °F
—

Glass Transition (Tg)

-30°C-22 °F
-50°C-58 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.5%
—

Water Absorption (Saturation)

2%
800%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.04 W/m·K0.02 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.04 W/m·K0.02 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

2,100 J/kg·K0.5 BTU/lb·°F
1,500 J/kg·K0.36 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

180 µm/m·K100 µin/in·°F
70 µm/m·K38.9 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

70°C158 °F
90°C194 °F

Min Service Temperature

-50°C-58 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

55°C131 °F
—

Limiting Oxygen Index

18%
19%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

90°C194 °F
120°C248 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in
1×10¹⁰ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁷ µΩ·in

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

1.4
1.1

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm
1×10¹² Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω
—

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

90 / 100
—

UV / Weathering Resistance

35 / 100
25 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

85 / 100
90 / 100

Weldability

70 / 100
30 / 100

Polishability

10 / 100
5 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

2.5%
1.5%

Melt Flow Rate

2.5 g/10 min
—

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

160°C320 °F
—

Mold Temperature (typ.)

165°C329 °F
50°C122 °F

Same in both: Formability (cold) 90 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

75 MJ/kg32,244 BTU/lb
102 MJ/kg43,852 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.4 kg CO₂/kg
4.6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

130 L/kg15.6 gal/lb
220 L/kg26.4 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

15%
10%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

17 kN·m/kg
4 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

0.1 MN·m/kg
0 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

0.3 mm²/s
0.8 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePU FoamEVA Foam

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityEVA FoamPU Foam
Default conditionClosed CellOpen Cell
Relative cost$$ Standard$ Budget
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both are offered for Injection molding. Both take the same 5 finishes: Chrome Plating (Plastic), EMI Shielding Coating, Soft Touch Coating, Spray Painting, UV Coating.

EVA Foam vs PU Foam — frequently asked

Is EVA Foam stronger than PU Foam?

Yes. EVA Foam has a typical tensile strength of 1 MPa (0.145 ksi) against 0.13 MPa (0.0189 ksi) for PU Foam — about 7.7 times as much.

Which is cheaper, EVA Foam or PU Foam?

PU Foam is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while EVA Foam is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, EVA Foam or PU Foam?

PU Foam, by a small margin. Both rate excellent for machinability — 90/100 against 85/100 for EVA Foam; for welding the order is EVA Foam first (very good, 70/100) then PU Foam (poor, 30/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in EVA Foam and PU Foam side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.