FabDigitFabDigit

PVC 1120 vs PVC-M

Polymer · grade comparison

PVC 1120 and PVC-M are both polymer grades. PVC 1120 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) against 44 MPa (6.38 ksi) for PVC-M, about 14% more; tensile strength follows at 52 MPa (7.54 ksi) vs 47 MPa (6.82 ksi). In exchange, PVC-M is the more ductile: elongation 100% versus 60% for PVC 1120. PVC 1120 is stiffer (2.9 GPa vs 2.7 GPa). On the shop floor, PVC-M welds better (very good vs good).

PVC 1120Choose it when strength drives the design.

PVC-MChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when it will be welded.

PVC 1120 vs PVC-M: properties

PVC 1120PVC-M

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

2.9 GPa0.42 Msi
2.7 GPa0.39 Msi

Shear Modulus

1.1 GPa0.15 Msi
1 GPa0.15 Msi

Bulk Modulus

5 GPa0.67 Msi
4 GPa0.61 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.38
0.39

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

52 MPa7.5 ksi
47 MPa6.8 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

50 MPa7.3 ksi
44 MPa6.4 ksi

Elongation at Break

60%
100%

Compressive Strength

66 MPa9.6 ksi
60 MPa8.7 ksi

Compressive Modulus

2.8 GPa0.41 Msi
2.6 GPa0.38 Msi

Flexural Strength

90 MPa13.1 ksi
72 MPa10.4 ksi

Flexural Modulus

2.9 GPa0.42 Msi
2.7 GPa0.38 Msi

Shear Strength

38 MPa5.5 ksi
35 MPa5.1 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

2.6 MPa·√m2.4 ksi·√in
4.5 MPa·√m4.1 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

50 J/m0.94 ft·lbf/in
600 J/m11.2 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

82 Shore D
78 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

115 HRR
108 HRR

Hardness, Rockwell M

—
68 HRM

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.41 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.4 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

80°C176 °F
78°C172 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.05%
0.1%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.2%
0.35%

Refractive Index

—
1.54

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.15 W/m·K0.09 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.16 W/m·K0.09 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

950 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F
980 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

66 µm/m·K36.7 µin/in·°F
75 µm/m·K41.7 µin/in·°F

Min Service Temperature

-10°C14 °F
-20°C-4 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

76°C169 °F
71°C160 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

72°C162 °F
65°C149 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

80°C176 °F
78°C172 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

45%
38%

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 60°C140 °F · Max Service Temperature (short-term) 70°C158 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

30 kV/mm762 V/mil
25 kV/mm635 V/mil

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.018
0.016

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in · Dielectric Constant (1 MHz) 3.1 · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm · Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

UV / Weathering Resistance

40 / 100
58 / 100

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 90 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

75 / 100
78 / 100

Weldability

60 / 100
80 / 100

Formability (cold)

55 / 100
60 / 100

Polishability

65 / 100
50 / 100

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

190°C374 °F
192°C378 °F

Same in both: Mold Shrinkage 0.3% · Mold Temperature (typ.) 40°C104 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

62 MJ/kg26,655 BTU/lb
68 MJ/kg29,235 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.6 kg CO₂/kg
2.8 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

180 L/kg21.6 gal/lb
130 L/kg15.6 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

3%
5%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

37 kN·m/kg
34 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2.1 MN·m/kg
1.9 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

431 kJ/m³
359 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePVC-MPVC 1120

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPVC 1120PVC-M
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$ Budget
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

PVC 1120 vs PVC-M — frequently asked

Is PVC 1120 stronger than PVC-M?

Yes. PVC 1120 has a typical yield strength of 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) against 44 MPa (6.38 ksi) for PVC-M — about 14% more. Tensile strength is 52 MPa (7.54 ksi) vs 47 MPa (6.82 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PVC 1120 or PVC-M?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($, budget); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, PVC 1120 or PVC-M?

PVC-M. Its weldability rates very good (80/100) against good (60/100) for PVC 1120.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PVC 1120 and PVC-M side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.