FabDigitFabDigit

ABS vs CAP

Polymer · grade comparison

ABS and CAP are both polymer grades. ABS is the stronger of the two: yield strength 42 MPa (6.09 ksi) against 30 MPa (4.35 ksi) for CAP, about 40% more; tensile strength follows at 43 MPa (6.24 ksi) vs 32 MPa (4.64 ksi). In exchange, CAP is the more ductile: elongation 50% versus 25% for ABS. ABS is lighter (1.04 g/cm³ vs 1.21 g/cm³ for CAP) and ABS is stiffer (2.3 GPa vs 1.4 GPa). On the shop floor, ABS welds better (very good vs good) and ABS sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than CAP (premium, $$$).

ABSChoose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

CAPChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

ABS vs CAP: properties

ABSCAP

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

2.3 GPa0.33 Msi
1.4 GPa0.2 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.85 GPa0.12 Msi
—

Bulk Modulus

4 GPa0.51 Msi
—

Poisson's Ratio

0.35
0.39

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

43 MPa6.2 ksi
32 MPa4.6 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

42 MPa6.1 ksi
30 MPa4.4 ksi

Elongation at Break

25%
50%

Compressive Strength

65 MPa9.4 ksi
45 MPa6.5 ksi

Compressive Modulus

2.2 GPa0.32 Msi
—

Flexural Strength

70 MPa10.2 ksi
45 MPa6.5 ksi

Flexural Modulus

2.3 GPa0.33 Msi
1.3 GPa0.19 Msi

Shear Strength

34 MPa4.9 ksi
26 MPa3.8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

3 MPa·√m2.7 ksi·√in
—

Izod Impact, Notched

200 J/m3.7 ft·lbf/in
160 J/m3 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Rockwell R

105 HRR
95 HRR

Same in both: Hardness, Shore D 78 Shore D

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.04 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.21 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

105°C221 °F
142°C288 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.3%
1.8%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

1%
3%

Melting Temperature (Tm)

—
190°C374 °F

Refractive Index

—
1.47

Light Transmission

—
89%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.17 W/m·K0.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.21 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,450 J/kg·K0.35 BTU/lb·°F
1,600 J/kg·K0.38 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

90 µm/m·K50 µin/in·°F
130 µm/m·K72.2 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

75°C167 °F
60°C140 °F

Min Service Temperature

-20°C-4 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

95°C203 °F
75°C167 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

85°C185 °F
55°C131 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

100°C212 °F
105°C221 °F

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

95°C203 °F
90°C194 °F

Same in both: Limiting Oxygen Index 19%

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in
1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

16 kV/mm406 V/mil
17 kV/mm432 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.9
3.4

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.009
0.02

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω
1×10¹³ Ω

Same in both: Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

68 / 100
55 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

22 / 100
55 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

80 / 100
78 / 100

Weldability

78 / 100
60 / 100

Formability (cold)

82 / 100
80 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
92 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.55%
0.45%

Melt Flow Rate

20 g/10 min
8 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

235°C455 °F
215°C419 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

60°C140 °F
55°C131 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

95 MJ/kg40,843 BTU/lb
100 MJ/kg42,992 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.8 kg CO₂/kg
4.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

200 L/kg24 gal/lb
350 L/kg41.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

5%
0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

41 kN·m/kg
26 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2.2 MN·m/kg
1.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

383 kJ/m³
321 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleABSCAP

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityABSCAP
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Injection moldingYes—
3D printingYes—
Default conditionUnfilled—
Relative cost$ Budget$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Chrome Plating (Plastic)Yes—
Conductive CoatingYes—
Dyeing (Nylon)Yes—
EMI Shielding CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Primer CoatingYes—
Soft Touch CoatingYes—
Spray PaintingYes—
Tinted CoatingYes—
UV CoatingYes—
Vacuum MetallizationYes—
Waterproof CoatingYes—

ABS vs CAP — frequently asked

Is ABS stronger than CAP?

Yes. ABS has a typical yield strength of 42 MPa (6.09 ksi) against 30 MPa (4.35 ksi) for CAP — about 40% more. Tensile strength is 43 MPa (6.24 ksi) vs 32 MPa (4.64 ksi).

Which is cheaper, ABS or CAP?

ABS is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while CAP is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, ABS or CAP?

ABS. Its weldability rates very good (78/100) against good (60/100) for CAP.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in ABS and CAP side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.