FabDigitFabDigit

Nickel Alloy Inconel 718 vs Nimonic 80A

Nickel Alloy · grade comparison

Nickel Alloy Inconel 718 and Nimonic 80A are both nickel alloy grades. Nimonic 80A is the stronger of the two: yield strength 700 MPa (102 ksi) against 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) for Inconel 718, about 27% more; tensile strength follows at 1,100 MPa (160 ksi) vs 965 MPa (140 ksi). In exchange, Inconel 718 is the more ductile: elongation 45% versus 27% for Nimonic 80A, and Nimonic 80A is harder (310 HB vs 200 HB). Nimonic 80A is stiffer (222 GPa vs 200 GPa) and Nimonic 80A runs hotter in service (815°C vs 540°C continuous). On the shop floor, Inconel 718 welds better (very good vs poor) and Inconel 718 sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than Nimonic 80A (high, $$$$).

Inconel 718Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when it will be welded.

Nimonic 80AChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

Inconel 718 vs Nimonic 80A: properties

Inconel 718Nimonic 80A

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

200 GPa29 Msi
222 GPa32.2 Msi

Shear Modulus

78 GPa11.3 Msi
85 GPa12.3 Msi

Bulk Modulus

163 GPa23.6 Msi
180 GPa26.1 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.29
0.31

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

965 MPa140 ksi
1,100 MPa160 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

550 MPa79.8 ksi
700 MPa102 ksi

Elongation at Break

45%
27%

Reduction in Area

55%
35%

Shear Strength

620 MPa89.9 ksi
680 MPa98.6 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

420 MPa60.9 ksi
440 MPa63.8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

130 MPa·√m118 ksi·√in
95 MPa·√m86.5 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

130 J95.9 ft·lbf
40 J29.5 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

200 HB
310 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

92 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

210 HV
325 HV

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
33 HRC

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,260°C2,300 °F
1,360°C2,480 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,336°C2,437 °F
1,390°C2,534 °F

Same in both: Density 8.19 g/cm³0.3 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

11.4 W/m·K6.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F
11.2 W/m·K6.5 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

435 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F
448 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

13 µm/m·K7.2 µin/in·°F
12.7 µm/m·K7.1 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

210 J/g90.3 BTU/lb
290 J/g125 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

540°C1,004 °F
815°C1,499 °F

Min Service Temperature

-253°C-423 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1.25×10⁻⁶ Ω·m49.2 µΩ·in
1.24×10⁻⁶ Ω·m48.8 µΩ·in

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 1.4 % IACS

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.1 V
-0.13 V

Corrosion Resistance

78 / 100
75 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

18 / 100
15 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

14%
12%

Weldability

70 / 100
30 / 100

Formability (cold)

55 / 100
30 / 100

Castability

45 / 100
—

Brazeability / Solderability

55 / 100
45 / 100

Polishability

80 / 100
75 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

250 MJ/kg107,481 BTU/lb
200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

16 kg CO₂/kg
13.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

250 L/kg30 gal/lb
1,400 L/kg168 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 35%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

118 kN·m/kg
134 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

24.4 MN·m/kg
27.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

756 kJ/m³
1,104 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

3.2 mm²/s
3.1 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 4

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every nickel alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0006.577.588.59Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleInconel 718Nimonic 80A

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityInconel 718Nimonic 80A
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
3D printingYes—
Default conditionSolution Annealed—
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$$ High
Min. machined wall1.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
ElectropolishingYes—
HVOF CoatingYes—

They share 3 finishes: Gold Plating, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

Inconel 718 vs Nimonic 80A — frequently asked

Is Nimonic 80A stronger than Inconel 718?

Yes. Nimonic 80A has a typical yield strength of 700 MPa (102 ksi) against 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) for Inconel 718 — about 27% more. Tensile strength is 1,100 MPa (160 ksi) vs 965 MPa (140 ksi).

Which is cheaper, Inconel 718 or Nimonic 80A?

Inconel 718 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while Nimonic 80A is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, Inconel 718 or Nimonic 80A?

Inconel 718. Its weldability rates very good (70/100) against poor (30/100) for Nimonic 80A.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Inconel 718 and Nimonic 80A side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.