FabDigitFabDigit

Nickel Alloy Inconel 718 vs Stainless Steel 17-4 PH

Cross-family material comparison

Nickel Alloy Inconel 718 is a nickel alloy grade and Stainless Steel 17-4 PH is a stainless steel grade — different families, so density, stiffness and cost move together with strength. 17-4 PH is the stronger of the two: yield strength 760 MPa (110 ksi) against 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) for Inconel 718, about 38% more; tensile strength follows at 1,030 MPa (149 ksi) vs 965 MPa (140 ksi). In exchange, Inconel 718 is the more ductile: elongation 45% versus 12% for 17-4 PH, and 17-4 PH is harder (311 HB vs 200 HB). 17-4 PH is lighter (7.78 g/cm³ vs 8.19 g/cm³ for Inconel 718) and Inconel 718 runs hotter in service (540°C vs 200°C continuous). On the shop floor, 17-4 PH machines more easily (fair vs poor).

Inconel 718Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

17-4 PHChoose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

Inconel 718 vs 17-4 PH: properties

Inconel 71817-4 PH

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

200 GPa29 Msi
196 GPa28.4 Msi

Shear Modulus

78 GPa11.3 Msi
77 GPa11.2 Msi

Bulk Modulus

163 GPa23.6 Msi
142 GPa20.6 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.29
0.27

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

965 MPa140 ksi
1,030 MPa149 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

550 MPa79.8 ksi
760 MPa110 ksi

Elongation at Break

45%
12%

Reduction in Area

55%
45%

Shear Strength

620 MPa89.9 ksi
660 MPa95.7 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

420 MPa60.9 ksi
550 MPa79.8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

130 MPa·√m118 ksi·√in
90 MPa·√m81.9 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

130 J95.9 ft·lbf
35 J25.8 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

200 HB
311 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

92 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

210 HV
330 HV

Compressive Strength

—
790 MPa115 ksi

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
33 HRC

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.19 g/cm³0.3 lb/in³
7.78 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,260°C2,300 °F
1,404°C2,559 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,336°C2,437 °F
1,440°C2,624 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

11.4 W/m·K6.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F
16.3 W/m·K9.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

435 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F
460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

13 µm/m·K7.2 µin/in·°F
10.8 µm/m·K6 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

210 J/g90.3 BTU/lb
270 J/g116 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

540°C1,004 °F
200°C392 °F

Min Service Temperature

-253°C-423 °F
-73°C-99 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

1.4 % IACS
2.2 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.25×10⁻⁶ Ω·m49.2 µΩ·in
8×10⁻⁷ Ω·m31.5 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.1 V
-0.15 V

Corrosion Resistance

78 / 100
52 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

18 / 100
45 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

14%
48%

Formability (cold)

55 / 100
35 / 100

Castability

45 / 100
65 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

55 / 100
45 / 100

Polishability

80 / 100
75 / 100

Same in both: Weldability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

250 MJ/kg107,481 BTU/lb
55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

16 kg CO₂/kg
5.2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

250 L/kg30 gal/lb
200 L/kg24 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

35%
50%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

118 kN·m/kg
132 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

24.4 MN·m/kg
25.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

756 kJ/m³
1,473 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

3.2 mm²/s
4.6 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

4
8

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.11101001,0005101520Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale17-4 PHInconel 718
MetalsPlasticsCeramics & glass

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityInconel 71817-4 PH
Casting & forging—Yes
Default conditionSolution AnnealedCondition A
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall1.5 mm0.8 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µmRa 1.6 µm
AlCrN—Yes
AlTiN—Yes
Black Oxide—Yes
CVD Al2O3—Yes
CVD TiCN—Yes
CVD TiN—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
Chrome Plating—Yes
CrN—Yes
DLC—Yes
Electroless Nickel (EN)—Yes
Electropolished (Metal AM)—Yes
Epoxy Coating—Yes
Hard Chrome Plating—Yes
MoS2—Yes
Multilayer CVD—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
PTFE Coating—Yes

Both are offered for CNC machining, Sheet metal and 3D printing. They share 5 finishes: Electropolishing, Gold Plating, HVOF Coating, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

Inconel 718 vs 17-4 PH — frequently asked

Is 17-4 PH stronger than Inconel 718?

Yes. 17-4 PH has a typical yield strength of 760 MPa (110 ksi) against 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) for Inconel 718 — about 38% more. Tensile strength is 1,030 MPa (149 ksi) vs 965 MPa (140 ksi).

Which is cheaper, Inconel 718 or 17-4 PH?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$, premium); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, Inconel 718 or 17-4 PH?

17-4 PH. Its machinability rates fair (45/100) against poor (18/100) for Inconel 718.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Inconel 718 and 17-4 PH side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.