FabDigitFabDigit

Nickel Alloy Inconel 718 vs Nimonic 115

Nickel Alloy · grade comparison

Nickel Alloy Inconel 718 and Nimonic 115 are both nickel alloy grades. Nimonic 115 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 865 MPa (125 ksi) against 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) for Inconel 718, about 57% more; tensile strength follows at 1,240 MPa (180 ksi) vs 965 MPa (140 ksi). In exchange, Inconel 718 is the more ductile: elongation 45% versus 25% for Nimonic 115, and Nimonic 115 is harder (360 HB vs 200 HB). Nimonic 115 is lighter (7.85 g/cm³ vs 8.19 g/cm³ for Inconel 718) and Nimonic 115 is stiffer (224 GPa vs 200 GPa). On the shop floor, Inconel 718 welds better (very good vs not recommended) and Inconel 718 sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than Nimonic 115 (high, $$$$).

Inconel 718Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when it will be welded.

Nimonic 115Choose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

Inconel 718 vs Nimonic 115: properties

Inconel 718Nimonic 115

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

200 GPa29 Msi
224 GPa32.5 Msi

Shear Modulus

78 GPa11.3 Msi
85 GPa12.3 Msi

Bulk Modulus

163 GPa23.6 Msi
190 GPa27.6 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.29
0.31

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

965 MPa140 ksi
1,240 MPa180 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

550 MPa79.8 ksi
865 MPa125 ksi

Elongation at Break

45%
25%

Reduction in Area

55%
28%

Shear Strength

620 MPa89.9 ksi
760 MPa110 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

420 MPa60.9 ksi
480 MPa69.6 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

130 MPa·√m118 ksi·√in
90 MPa·√m81.9 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

130 J95.9 ft·lbf
25 J18.4 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

200 HB
360 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

92 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

210 HV
380 HV

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
39 HRC

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.19 g/cm³0.3 lb/in³
7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,260°C2,300 °F
1,290°C2,354 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,336°C2,437 °F
1,360°C2,480 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

11.4 W/m·K6.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F
10.7 W/m·K6.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

435 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F
448 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

13 µm/m·K7.2 µin/in·°F
12.2 µm/m·K6.8 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

210 J/g90.3 BTU/lb
290 J/g125 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

540°C1,004 °F
980°C1,796 °F

Min Service Temperature

-253°C-423 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

1.4 % IACS
1.2 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.25×10⁻⁶ Ω·m49.2 µΩ·in
1.39×10⁻⁶ Ω·m54.7 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.1 V
-0.15 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 78 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

18 / 100
10 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

14%
8%

Weldability

70 / 100
8 / 100

Formability (cold)

55 / 100
8 / 100

Castability

45 / 100
60 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

55 / 100
45 / 100

Polishability

80 / 100
70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

250 MJ/kg107,481 BTU/lb
210 MJ/kg90,284 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

16 kg CO₂/kg
15 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

250 L/kg30 gal/lb
220 L/kg26.4 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

35%
30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

118 kN·m/kg
158 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

24.4 MN·m/kg
28.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

756 kJ/m³
1,670 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

3.2 mm²/s
3 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

4
5

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every nickel alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0006.577.588.59Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleInconel 718Nimonic 115

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityInconel 718Nimonic 115
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
3D printingYes—
Default conditionSolution Annealed—
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$$ High
Min. machined wall1.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
ElectropolishingYes—
HVOF CoatingYes—

They share 3 finishes: Gold Plating, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

Inconel 718 vs Nimonic 115 — frequently asked

Is Nimonic 115 stronger than Inconel 718?

Yes. Nimonic 115 has a typical yield strength of 865 MPa (125 ksi) against 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) for Inconel 718 — about 57% more. Tensile strength is 1,240 MPa (180 ksi) vs 965 MPa (140 ksi).

Which is cheaper, Inconel 718 or Nimonic 115?

Inconel 718 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while Nimonic 115 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, Inconel 718 or Nimonic 115?

Inconel 718. Its machinability rates poor (18/100) against not recommended (10/100) for Nimonic 115; for welding the order is Inconel 718 first (very good, 70/100) then Nimonic 115 (not recommended, 8/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Inconel 718 and Nimonic 115 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.