FabDigitFabDigit

Nickel Alloy CW-12MW vs IN-713C

Nickel Alloy · grade comparison

Nickel Alloy CW-12MW and IN-713C are both nickel alloy grades. IN-713C is the stronger of the two: yield strength 740 MPa (107 ksi) against 350 MPa (50.8 ksi) for CW-12MW, about 111% more; tensile strength follows at 850 MPa (123 ksi) vs 550 MPa (79.8 ksi). In exchange, CW-12MW is the more ductile: elongation 10% versus 8% for IN-713C, and IN-713C is harder (330 HB vs 200 HB). IN-713C is lighter (7.91 g/cm³ vs 8.94 g/cm³ for CW-12MW) and IN-713C runs hotter in service (950°C vs 650°C continuous). On the shop floor, CW-12MW machines more easily (poor vs not recommended) and CW-12MW welds better (good vs not recommended).

CW-12MWChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

IN-713CChoose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

CW-12MW vs IN-713C: properties

CW-12MWIN-713C

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

550 MPa79.8 ksi
850 MPa123 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

350 MPa50.8 ksi
740 MPa107 ksi

Elongation at Break

10%
8%

Reduction in Area

12%
9%

Shear Strength

385 MPa55.8 ksi
600 MPa87 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

220 MPa31.9 ksi
310 MPa45 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

70 J51.6 ft·lbf
—

Hardness, Brinell

200 HB
330 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

94 HRB
—

Hardness, Rockwell C

15 HRC
34 HRC

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
60 MPa·√m54.6 ksi·√in

Hardness, Vickers

—
350 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 205 GPa29.7 Msi · Shear Modulus 78 GPa11.3 Msi · Bulk Modulus 180 GPa26.1 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.31

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.94 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
7.91 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,275°C2,327 °F
1,260°C2,300 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,355°C2,471 °F
1,345°C2,453 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

10.2 W/m·K5.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F
10.9 W/m·K6.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

385 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F
460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

11.3 µm/m·K6.3 µin/in·°F
10.6 µm/m·K5.9 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

650°C1,202 °F
950°C1,742 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-200°C-328 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 290 J/g125 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1.3×10⁻⁶ Ω·m51.2 µΩ·in
1.32×10⁻⁶ Ω·m52 µΩ·in

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 1.3 % IACS

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.08 V
-0.15 V

Corrosion Resistance

86 / 100
68 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

22 / 100
10 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

12%
8%

Weldability

55 / 100
10 / 100

Formability (cold)

15 / 100
3 / 100

Castability

60 / 100
88 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

55 / 100
45 / 100

Polishability

65 / 100
60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

150 MJ/kg64,488 BTU/lb
190 MJ/kg81,685 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12.5 kg CO₂/kg
13.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb
400 L/kg47.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

40%
35%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

62 kN·m/kg
107 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

22.9 MN·m/kg
25.9 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

299 kJ/m³
1,336 kJ/m³

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

2
4

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 3 mm²/s

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every nickel alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0006.577.588.59Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleCW-12MWIN-713C

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityCW-12MWIN-713C
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 3 finishes: Gold Plating, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

CW-12MW vs IN-713C — frequently asked

Is IN-713C stronger than CW-12MW?

Yes. IN-713C has a typical yield strength of 740 MPa (107 ksi) against 350 MPa (50.8 ksi) for CW-12MW — about 111% more. Tensile strength is 850 MPa (123 ksi) vs 550 MPa (79.8 ksi).

Which is cheaper, CW-12MW or IN-713C?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, CW-12MW or IN-713C?

CW-12MW. Its machinability rates poor (22/100) against not recommended (10/100) for IN-713C; for welding the order is CW-12MW first (good, 55/100) then IN-713C (not recommended, 10/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in CW-12MW and IN-713C side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.