FabDigitFabDigit

Nickel Alloy CW-12MW vs CX2MW

Nickel Alloy · grade comparison

Nickel Alloy CW-12MW and CX2MW are both nickel alloy grades. CX2MW is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 620 MPa (89.9 ksi) against 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) for CW-12MW, about 13% more. CX2MW is the more ductile: elongation 45% versus 10% for CW-12MW. CX2MW conducts electricity better (1.5 % IACS vs 1.3 % IACS). On the shop floor, CX2MW welds better (very good vs good).

CX2MWChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

CW-12MW vs CX2MW: properties

CW-12MWCX2MW

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

205 GPa29.7 Msi
200 GPa29 Msi

Shear Modulus

78 GPa11.3 Msi
77 GPa11.2 Msi

Bulk Modulus

180 GPa26.1 Msi
176 GPa25.5 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

550 MPa79.8 ksi
620 MPa89.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

350 MPa50.8 ksi
335 MPa48.6 ksi

Elongation at Break

10%
45%

Reduction in Area

12%
40%

Shear Strength

385 MPa55.8 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

220 MPa31.9 ksi
250 MPa36.3 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

70 J51.6 ft·lbf
120 J88.5 ft·lbf

Hardness, Rockwell B

94 HRB
90 HRB

Hardness, Rockwell C

15 HRC
—

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.31 · Hardness, Brinell 200 HB

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.94 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
8.69 g/cm³0.31 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,275°C2,327 °F
1,357°C2,475 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,355°C2,471 °F
1,399°C2,550 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

10.2 W/m·K5.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F
10.1 W/m·K5.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

385 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F
414 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

11.3 µm/m·K6.3 µin/in·°F
12.4 µm/m·K6.9 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

650°C1,202 °F
675°C1,247 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 290 J/g125 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

1.3 % IACS
1.5 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.3×10⁻⁶ Ω·m51.2 µΩ·in
1.14×10⁻⁶ Ω·m44.9 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.08 V
-0.15 V

Corrosion Resistance

86 / 100
92 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

22 / 100
15 / 100

Weldability

55 / 100
75 / 100

Formability (cold)

15 / 100
—

Brazeability / Solderability

55 / 100
50 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 12% · Castability 60 / 100 · Polishability 65 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

150 MJ/kg64,488 BTU/lb
145 MJ/kg62,339 BTU/lb

Embodied Water

300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb
200 L/kg24 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12.5 kg CO₂/kg · Typical Recycled Content 40%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

62 kN·m/kg
71 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

22.9 MN·m/kg
23 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

299 kJ/m³
281 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

3 mm²/s
2.8 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

2
3

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every nickel alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0006.577.588.59Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleCW-12MWCX2MW

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityCW-12MWCX2MW
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 3 finishes: Gold Plating, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

CW-12MW vs CX2MW — frequently asked

Is CX2MW stronger than CW-12MW?

Yes. CX2MW has a typical tensile strength of 620 MPa (89.9 ksi) against 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) for CW-12MW — about 13% more.

Which is cheaper, CW-12MW or CX2MW?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, CW-12MW or CX2MW?

CW-12MW, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 22/100 against 15/100 for CX2MW; for welding the order is CX2MW first (very good, 75/100) then CW-12MW (good, 55/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in CW-12MW and CX2MW side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.