FabDigitFabDigit

Nickel Alloy Alloy 52 vs Mu-metal

Nickel Alloy · grade comparison

Nickel Alloy Alloy 52 and Mu-metal are both nickel alloy grades. Alloy 52 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 280 MPa (40.6 ksi) against 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) for Mu-metal, about 12% more. In exchange, Mu-metal is the more ductile: elongation 40% versus 35% for Alloy 52, and Alloy 52 is harder (150 HB vs 115 HB). Alloy 52 is lighter (8.3 g/cm³ vs 8.74 g/cm³ for Mu-metal) and Mu-metal is stiffer (215 GPa vs 150 GPa). On the shop floor, Alloy 52 welds better (very good vs good).

Alloy 52Choose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

Mu-metalChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

Alloy 52 vs Mu-metal: properties

Alloy 52Mu-metal

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

150 GPa21.8 Msi
215 GPa31.2 Msi

Shear Modulus

57 GPa8.3 Msi
80 GPa11.6 Msi

Bulk Modulus

125 GPa18.1 Msi
180 GPa26.1 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

520 MPa75.4 ksi
550 MPa79.8 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

280 MPa40.6 ksi
250 MPa36.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

35%
40%

Reduction in Area

60%
65%

Compressive Strength

285 MPa41.3 ksi
—

Shear Strength

340 MPa49.3 ksi
360 MPa52.2 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

250 MPa36.3 ksi
240 MPa34.8 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

130 J95.9 ft·lbf
150 J111 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

150 HB
115 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

80 HRB
65 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

155 HV
120 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.3

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.3 g/cm³0.3 lb/in³
8.74 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,425°C2,597 °F
1,400°C2,552 °F

Same in both: Liquidus Temperature 1,450°C2,642 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

13.5 W/m·K7.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F
31 W/m·K17.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F
460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

9.9 µm/m·K5.5 µin/in·°F
12.7 µm/m·K7.1 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

500°C932 °F
400°C752 °F

Latent Heat of Fusion

—
285 J/g123 BTU/lb

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

4 % IACS
3 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.3×10⁻⁷ Ω·m16.9 µΩ·in
5.7×10⁻⁷ Ω·m22.4 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

30 / 100
55 / 100

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

—
-0.2 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

30 / 100
25 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

30%
22%

Weldability

70 / 100
55 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

85 / 100
70 / 100

Castability

—
30 / 100

Same in both: Formability (cold) 80 / 100 · Polishability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

95 MJ/kg40,843 BTU/lb
140 MJ/kg60,189 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

7.5 kg CO₂/kg
10.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

220 L/kg26.4 gal/lb
400 L/kg47.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

30%
25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

18.1 MN·m/kg
24.6 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

261 kJ/m³
145 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

3.3 mm²/s
7.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

5
6

Same in both: Specific Strength (UTS / density) 63 kN·m/kg

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every nickel alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0006.577.588.59Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleMu-metalAlloy 52

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityAlloy 52Mu-metal
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 3 finishes: Gold Plating, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

Alloy 52 vs Mu-metal — frequently asked

Is Alloy 52 stronger than Mu-metal?

Yes. Alloy 52 has a typical yield strength of 280 MPa (40.6 ksi) against 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) for Mu-metal — about 12% more. Tensile strength is 520 MPa (75.4 ksi) vs 550 MPa (79.8 ksi).

Which is cheaper, Alloy 52 or Mu-metal?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, Alloy 52 or Mu-metal?

Alloy 52, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 30/100 against 25/100 for Mu-metal; for welding the order is Alloy 52 first (very good, 70/100) then Mu-metal (good, 55/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Alloy 52 and Mu-metal side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.