FabDigitFabDigit

Nickel Alloy Alloy 48 vs Mu-metal

Nickel Alloy · grade comparison

Nickel Alloy Alloy 48 and Mu-metal are both nickel alloy grades. Mu-metal is the stronger of the two: yield strength 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) against 200 MPa (29 ksi) for Alloy 48, about 25% more; tensile strength follows at 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) vs 500 MPa (72.5 ksi). Mu-metal is the more ductile: elongation 40% versus 35% for Alloy 48, and Alloy 48 is harder (125 HB vs 115 HB). Alloy 48 is lighter (8.25 g/cm³ vs 8.74 g/cm³ for Mu-metal) and Mu-metal is stiffer (215 GPa vs 152 GPa). On the shop floor, Alloy 48 welds better (65 vs 55 out of 100).

Alloy 48Choose it when weight is the constraint, or when it will be welded.

Mu-metalChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

Alloy 48 vs Mu-metal: properties

Alloy 48Mu-metal

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

152 GPa22 Msi
215 GPa31.2 Msi

Shear Modulus

58 GPa8.4 Msi
80 GPa11.6 Msi

Bulk Modulus

127 GPa18.4 Msi
180 GPa26.1 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

500 MPa72.5 ksi
550 MPa79.8 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

200 MPa29 ksi
250 MPa36.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

35%
40%

Shear Strength

350 MPa50.8 ksi
360 MPa52.2 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

125 HB
115 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

70 HRB
65 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

130 HV
120 HV

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
150 J111 ft·lbf

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.3 · Reduction in Area 65% · Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit) 240 MPa34.8 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.25 g/cm³0.3 lb/in³
8.74 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,425°C2,597 °F
1,400°C2,552 °F

Same in both: Liquidus Temperature 1,450°C2,642 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

13.5 W/m·K7.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F
31 W/m·K17.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F
460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

9.2 µm/m·K5.1 µin/in·°F
12.7 µm/m·K7.1 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

270 J/g116 BTU/lb
285 J/g123 BTU/lb

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 400°C752 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

3.8 % IACS
3 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m17.7 µΩ·in
5.7×10⁻⁷ Ω·m22.4 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.32 V
-0.2 V

Corrosion Resistance

32 / 100
55 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

30 / 100
25 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

25%
22%

Weldability

65 / 100
55 / 100

Formability (cold)

85 / 100
80 / 100

Castability

40 / 100
30 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

72 / 100
70 / 100

Polishability

75 / 100
70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

92 MJ/kg39,553 BTU/lb
140 MJ/kg60,189 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

7.5 kg CO₂/kg
10.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

200 L/kg24 gal/lb
400 L/kg47.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

30%
25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

61 kN·m/kg
63 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

18.4 MN·m/kg
24.6 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

132 kJ/m³
145 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

3.3 mm²/s
7.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

5
6

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every nickel alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0006.577.588.59Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleAlloy 48Mu-metal

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityAlloy 48Mu-metal
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 3 finishes: Gold Plating, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

Alloy 48 vs Mu-metal — frequently asked

Is Mu-metal stronger than Alloy 48?

Yes. Mu-metal has a typical yield strength of 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) against 200 MPa (29 ksi) for Alloy 48 — about 25% more. Tensile strength is 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) vs 500 MPa (72.5 ksi).

Which is cheaper, Alloy 48 or Mu-metal?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, Alloy 48 or Mu-metal?

Alloy 48, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 30/100 against 25/100 for Mu-metal; for welding the order is Alloy 48 first (good, 65/100) then Mu-metal (good, 55/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Alloy 48 and Mu-metal side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.