FabDigitFabDigit

Nickel Alloy Alloy 52 vs Ni-Span-C 902

Nickel Alloy · grade comparison

Nickel Alloy Alloy 52 and Ni-Span-C 902 are both nickel alloy grades. Ni-Span-C 902 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 310 MPa (45 ksi) against 280 MPa (40.6 ksi) for Alloy 52, about 11% more; tensile strength follows at 690 MPa (100 ksi) vs 520 MPa (75.4 ksi). Ni-Span-C 902 is the more ductile: elongation 45% versus 35% for Alloy 52, and Ni-Span-C 902 is harder (165 HB vs 150 HB). Ni-Span-C 902 is lighter (8.05 g/cm³ vs 8.3 g/cm³ for Alloy 52) and Ni-Span-C 902 is stiffer (179 GPa vs 150 GPa). On the shop floor, Alloy 52 welds better (very good vs good).

Alloy 52Choose it when the part sees heat, or when it will be welded.

Ni-Span-C 902Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

Alloy 52 vs Ni-Span-C 902: properties

Alloy 52Ni-Span-C 902

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

150 GPa21.8 Msi
179 GPa26 Msi

Shear Modulus

57 GPa8.3 Msi
69 GPa10 Msi

Bulk Modulus

125 GPa18.1 Msi
150 GPa21.8 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

520 MPa75.4 ksi
690 MPa100 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

280 MPa40.6 ksi
310 MPa45 ksi

Elongation at Break

35%
45%

Compressive Strength

285 MPa41.3 ksi
—

Shear Strength

340 MPa49.3 ksi
460 MPa66.7 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

250 MPa36.3 ksi
310 MPa45 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

130 J95.9 ft·lbf
110 J81.1 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

150 HB
165 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

80 HRB
85 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

155 HV
—

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.3 · Reduction in Area 60%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.3 g/cm³0.3 lb/in³
8.05 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³

Liquidus Temperature

1,450°C2,642 °F
1,440°C2,624 °F

Same in both: Melting Point (Solidus) 1,425°C2,597 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

13.5 W/m·K7.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F
13.8 W/m·K8 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F
502 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

9.9 µm/m·K5.5 µin/in·°F
8 µm/m·K4.4 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

500°C932 °F
200°C392 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-100°C-148 °F

Latent Heat of Fusion

—
285 J/g123 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

4 % IACS
1.7 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.3×10⁻⁷ Ω·m16.9 µΩ·in
1.02×10⁻⁶ Ω·m40.2 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

30 / 100
40 / 100

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

—
-0.4 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

30%
25%

Weldability

70 / 100
55 / 100

Formability (cold)

80 / 100
70 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

85 / 100
45 / 100

Castability

—
25 / 100

Same in both: Machinability 30 / 100 · Polishability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

95 MJ/kg40,843 BTU/lb
115 MJ/kg49,441 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

7.5 kg CO₂/kg
8 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

220 L/kg26.4 gal/lb
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

30%
25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

63 kN·m/kg
86 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

18.1 MN·m/kg
22.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

261 kJ/m³
268 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

3.3 mm²/s
3.4 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

5
7

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every nickel alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0006.577.588.59Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleAlloy 52Ni-Span-C 902

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityAlloy 52Ni-Span-C 902
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 3 finishes: Gold Plating, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

Alloy 52 vs Ni-Span-C 902 — frequently asked

Is Ni-Span-C 902 stronger than Alloy 52?

Yes. Ni-Span-C 902 has a typical yield strength of 310 MPa (45 ksi) against 280 MPa (40.6 ksi) for Alloy 52 — about 11% more. Tensile strength is 690 MPa (100 ksi) vs 520 MPa (75.4 ksi).

Which is cheaper, Alloy 52 or Ni-Span-C 902?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, Alloy 52 or Ni-Span-C 902?

Alloy 52. Its weldability rates very good (70/100) against good (55/100) for Ni-Span-C 902.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Alloy 52 and Ni-Span-C 902 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.