FabDigitFabDigit

Borofloat 33 vs HPFS 7980

Glass · grade comparison

Borofloat 33 and HPFS 7980 are both glass grades. HPFS 7980 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) against 35 MPa (5.08 ksi) for Borofloat 33, about 43% more. HPFS 7980 is harder — 800 HV against 480 HV for Borofloat 33 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. HPFS 7980 is stiffer (72.7 GPa vs 64 GPa) and HPFS 7980 runs hotter in service (900°C vs 450°C continuous). On the shop floor, Borofloat 33 sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than HPFS 7980 (high, $$$$).

Borofloat 33Choose it when cost is the deciding factor.

HPFS 7980Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

Borofloat 33 vs HPFS 7980: properties

Borofloat 33HPFS 7980

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

64 GPa9.3 Msi
72.7 GPa10.5 Msi

Shear Modulus

26.7 GPa3.9 Msi
31.4 GPa4.6 Msi

Bulk Modulus

36 GPa5.2 Msi
37 GPa5.4 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.2
0.17

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

35 MPa5.1 ksi
50 MPa7.3 ksi

Compressive Strength

1,000 MPa145 ksi
1,100 MPa160 ksi

Flexural Strength

25 MPa3.6 ksi
55 MPa8 ksi

Shear Strength

25 MPa3.6 ksi
—

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

0.77 MPa·√m0.7 ksi·√in
0.72 MPa·√m0.66 ksi·√in

Hardness, Vickers

480 HV
800 HV

Hardness, Knoop

480 HK
522 HK

Same in both: Elongation at Break 0% · Hardness, Mohs 6

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.23 g/cm³0.08 lb/in³
2.2 g/cm³0.08 lb/in³

Refractive Index

1.471
1.459

Light Transmission

92%
93%

Melting Point (Solidus)

—
1,713°C3,115 °F

Same in both: Porosity 0%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

1.2 W/m·K0.69 BTU/hr·ft·°F
1.3 W/m·K0.75 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

830 J/kg·K0.2 BTU/lb·°F
740 J/kg·K0.18 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

3.3 µm/m·K1.8 µin/in·°F
0.55 µm/m·K0.31 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

450°C842 °F
900°C1,652 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-200°C-328 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in
1×10¹⁶ Ω·m3.94×10²³ µΩ·in

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

4.6
3.83

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.0037
1×10⁻⁴

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁸ Ω·cm

Same in both: Dielectric Strength 30 kV/mm762 V/mil

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

92 / 100
95 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Polishability

95 / 100
99 / 100

Same in both: Machinability 12 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

25 MJ/kg10,748 BTU/lb
300 MJ/kg128,977 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

1.8 kg CO₂/kg
20 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

15 L/kg1.8 gal/lb
250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

10%
0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

16 kN·m/kg
23 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

28.7 MN·m/kg
33 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

0.6 mm²/s
0.8 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

0
2

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every glass grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005002.533.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleBorofloat 33

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityBorofloat 33HPFS 7980
Default conditionAnnealed Glass—
Relative cost$$ Standard$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Borofloat 33 vs HPFS 7980 — frequently asked

Is HPFS 7980 stronger than Borofloat 33?

Yes. HPFS 7980 has a typical tensile strength of 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) against 35 MPa (5.08 ksi) for Borofloat 33 — about 43% more.

Which is cheaper, Borofloat 33 or HPFS 7980?

Borofloat 33 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while HPFS 7980 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

When should I choose Borofloat 33 over HPFS 7980?

Pick Borofloat 33 when cost is the deciding factor. Pick HPFS 7980 when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Borofloat 33 and HPFS 7980 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.