FabDigitFabDigit

Borofloat 33 vs E-Glass

Glass · grade comparison

Borofloat 33 and E-Glass are both glass grades. E-Glass is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 3,400 MPa (493 ksi) against 35 MPa (5.08 ksi) for Borofloat 33, about 97 times as much. E-Glass is the more ductile: elongation 4.8% versus 0% for Borofloat 33, and E-Glass is harder (600 HV vs 480 HV). Borofloat 33 is lighter (2.23 g/cm³ vs 2.58 g/cm³ for E-Glass) and E-Glass is stiffer (73 GPa vs 64 GPa). On the shop floor, E-Glass sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than Borofloat 33 (standard, $$).

Borofloat 33Choose it when weight is the constraint.

E-GlassChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

Borofloat 33 vs E-Glass: properties

Borofloat 33E-Glass

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

64 GPa9.3 Msi
73 GPa10.6 Msi

Shear Modulus

26.7 GPa3.9 Msi
30 GPa4.4 Msi

Bulk Modulus

36 GPa5.2 Msi
43 GPa6.2 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.2
0.22

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

35 MPa5.1 ksi
3,400 MPa493 ksi

Elongation at Break

0%
4.8%

Compressive Strength

1,000 MPa145 ksi
1,050 MPa152 ksi

Flexural Strength

25 MPa3.6 ksi
—

Shear Strength

25 MPa3.6 ksi
—

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

0.77 MPa·√m0.7 ksi·√in
0.72 MPa·√m0.66 ksi·√in

Hardness, Vickers

480 HV
600 HV

Hardness, Knoop

480 HK
550 HK

Hardness, Mohs

6
6.5

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.23 g/cm³0.08 lb/in³
2.58 g/cm³0.09 lb/in³

Refractive Index

1.471
1.558

Light Transmission

92%
—

Melting Point (Solidus)

—
1,065°C1,949 °F

Same in both: Porosity 0%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

1.2 W/m·K0.69 BTU/hr·ft·°F
1.1 W/m·K0.64 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

830 J/kg·K0.2 BTU/lb·°F
810 J/kg·K0.19 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

3.3 µm/m·K1.8 µin/in·°F
5.4 µm/m·K3 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

450°C842 °F
550°C1,022 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-200°C-328 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

30 kV/mm762 V/mil
12 kV/mm305 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

4.6
6.2

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.0037
0.0018

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

92 / 100
62 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

12 / 100
15 / 100

Polishability

95 / 100
60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

25 MJ/kg10,748 BTU/lb
45 MJ/kg19,347 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

1.8 kg CO₂/kg
2.6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

15 L/kg1.8 gal/lb
130 L/kg15.6 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

10%
5%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

16 kN·m/kg
1,318 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

28.7 MN·m/kg
28.3 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

0.6 mm²/s
0.5 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

0
9

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every glass grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005002.533.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleBorofloat 33

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityBorofloat 33E-Glass
Default conditionAnnealed Glass—
Relative cost$$ Standard$ Budget
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Borofloat 33 vs E-Glass — frequently asked

Is E-Glass stronger than Borofloat 33?

Yes. E-Glass has a typical tensile strength of 3,400 MPa (493 ksi) against 35 MPa (5.08 ksi) for Borofloat 33 — about 97 times as much.

Which is cheaper, Borofloat 33 or E-Glass?

E-Glass is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while Borofloat 33 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

When should I choose Borofloat 33 over E-Glass?

Pick Borofloat 33 when weight is the constraint. Pick E-Glass when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Borofloat 33 and E-Glass side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.