FabDigitFabDigit

Borofloat 33 vs Gorilla Glass

Glass · grade comparison

Borofloat 33 and Gorilla Glass are both glass grades. Gorilla Glass is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 350 MPa (50.8 ksi) against 35 MPa (5.08 ksi) for Borofloat 33, about 10 times as much. Gorilla Glass is harder — 620 HV against 480 HV for Borofloat 33 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. Borofloat 33 is lighter (2.23 g/cm³ vs 2.42 g/cm³ for Gorilla Glass) and Gorilla Glass is stiffer (72 GPa vs 64 GPa).

Borofloat 33Choose it when weight is the constraint, or when the part sees heat.

Gorilla GlassChoose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

Borofloat 33 vs Gorilla Glass: properties

Borofloat 33Gorilla Glass

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

64 GPa9.3 Msi
72 GPa10.4 Msi

Shear Modulus

26.7 GPa3.9 Msi
29.5 GPa4.3 Msi

Bulk Modulus

36 GPa5.2 Msi
42 GPa6.1 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.2
0.21

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

35 MPa5.1 ksi
350 MPa50.8 ksi

Flexural Strength

25 MPa3.6 ksi
800 MPa116 ksi

Shear Strength

25 MPa3.6 ksi
—

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

0.77 MPa·√m0.7 ksi·√in
0.75 MPa·√m0.68 ksi·√in

Hardness, Vickers

480 HV
620 HV

Hardness, Knoop

480 HK
590 HK

Hardness, Mohs

6
6.5

Same in both: Elongation at Break 0% · Compressive Strength 1,000 MPa145 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.23 g/cm³0.08 lb/in³
2.42 g/cm³0.09 lb/in³

Refractive Index

1.471
1.5

Light Transmission

92%
92%

Same in both: Porosity 0%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

1.2 W/m·K0.69 BTU/hr·ft·°F
1 W/m·K0.58 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

830 J/kg·K0.2 BTU/lb·°F
820 J/kg·K0.2 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

3.3 µm/m·K1.8 µin/in·°F
7.9 µm/m·K4.4 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

450°C842 °F
200°C392 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-100°C-148 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in
1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

30 kV/mm762 V/mil
15 kV/mm381 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

4.6
7.2

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.0037
0.011

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

92 / 100
90 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

12 / 100
5 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 95 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

25 MJ/kg10,748 BTU/lb
35 MJ/kg15,047 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

1.8 kg CO₂/kg
2.6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

15 L/kg1.8 gal/lb
25 L/kg3 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

10%
3%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

16 kN·m/kg
145 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

28.7 MN·m/kg
29.8 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

0.6 mm²/s
0.5 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

0
1

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every glass grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005002.533.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleBorofloat 33Gorilla Glass

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityBorofloat 33Gorilla Glass
Default conditionAnnealed GlassChem Strengthened
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Borofloat 33 vs Gorilla Glass — frequently asked

Is Gorilla Glass stronger than Borofloat 33?

Yes. Gorilla Glass has a typical tensile strength of 350 MPa (50.8 ksi) against 35 MPa (5.08 ksi) for Borofloat 33 — about 10 times as much.

Which is cheaper, Borofloat 33 or Gorilla Glass?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, Borofloat 33 or Gorilla Glass?

Borofloat 33, by a small margin. Both rate not recommended for machinability — 12/100 against 5/100 for Gorilla Glass.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Borofloat 33 and Gorilla Glass side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.