FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C94400 vs C95500

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C94400 and C95500 are both copper alloy grades. C95500 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 300 MPa (43.5 ksi) against 110 MPa (16 ksi) for C94400, about 173% more; tensile strength follows at 700 MPa (102 ksi) vs 221 MPa (32.1 ksi). In exchange, C94400 is the more ductile: elongation 18% versus 8% for C95500, and C95500 is harder (192 HB vs 55 HB). C95500 is lighter (7.53 g/cm³ vs 8.93 g/cm³ for C94400) and C95500 is stiffer (110 GPa vs 76 GPa). On the shop floor, C94400 machines more easily (very good vs fair), C95500 welds better (good vs not recommended), and C94400 sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than C95500 (specialty, $$$$$).

C94400Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

C95500Choose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

C94400 vs C95500: properties

C94400C95500

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

76 GPa11 Msi
110 GPa16 Msi

Shear Modulus

28 GPa4.1 Msi
42 GPa6.1 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.34
0.32

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

221 MPa32.1 ksi
700 MPa102 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

110 MPa16 ksi
300 MPa43.5 ksi

Elongation at Break

18%
8%

Compressive Strength

205 MPa29.7 ksi
—

Shear Strength

150 MPa21.8 ksi
425 MPa61.6 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

76 MPa11 ksi
240 MPa34.8 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

10 J7.4 ft·lbf
20 J14.8 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

55 HB
192 HB

Hardness, Vickers

58 HV
—

Bulk Modulus

—
102 GPa14.8 Msi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
50 MPa·√m45.5 ksi·√in

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
92 HRB

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.93 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
7.53 g/cm³0.27 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

762°C1,404 °F
1,054°C1,929 °F

Liquidus Temperature

954°C1,749 °F
1,064°C1,947 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

47 W/m·K27.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F
42 W/m·K24.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F
419 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

18.5 µm/m·K10.3 µin/in·°F
16.2 µm/m·K9 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

230°C446 °F
300°C572 °F

Min Service Temperature

-200°C-328 °F
-100°C-148 °F

Latent Heat of Fusion

—
210 J/g90.3 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

12 % IACS
8.5 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.44×10⁻⁷ Ω·m5.67 µΩ·in
2.03×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.99 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

55 / 100
80 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.28 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

82 / 100
40 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

80%
50%

Weldability

12 / 100
60 / 100

Formability (cold)

8 / 100
15 / 100

Castability

90 / 100
75 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

45 / 100
30 / 100

Polishability

55 / 100
70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb
60 MJ/kg25,795 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.7 kg CO₂/kg
4.2 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

85%
40%

Same in both: Embodied Water 250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

25 kN·m/kg
93 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

8.5 MN·m/kg
14.6 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

80 kJ/m³
409 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

14 mm²/s
13.3 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

7
16

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC95500C94400

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC94400C95500
CNC machining—Yes
Default condition—As Cast
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$$ Specialty
Min. machined wall—0.8 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 1.6 µm
Chrome Plating—Yes
Electropolishing—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Tin Plating—Yes

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C94400 vs C95500 — frequently asked

Is C95500 stronger than C94400?

Yes. C95500 has a typical yield strength of 300 MPa (43.5 ksi) against 110 MPa (16 ksi) for C94400 — about 173% more. Tensile strength is 700 MPa (102 ksi) vs 221 MPa (32.1 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C94400 or C95500?

C94400 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while C95500 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, C94400 or C95500?

C94400. Its machinability rates very good (82/100) against fair (40/100) for C95500; for welding the order is C95500 first (good, 60/100) then C94400 (not recommended, 12/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C94400 and C95500 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.