FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C84400 vs C95500

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C84400 and C95500 are both copper alloy grades. C95500 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 300 MPa (43.5 ksi) against 110 MPa (16 ksi) for C84400, about 173% more; tensile strength follows at 700 MPa (102 ksi) vs 234 MPa (33.9 ksi). In exchange, C84400 is the more ductile: elongation 26% versus 8% for C95500, and C95500 is harder (192 HB vs 55 HB). C95500 is lighter (7.53 g/cm³ vs 8.8 g/cm³ for C84400) and C95500 is stiffer (110 GPa vs 95 GPa). On the shop floor, C84400 machines more easily (excellent vs fair) and C95500 welds better (good vs poor).

C84400Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

C95500Choose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

C84400 vs C95500: properties

C84400C95500

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

95 GPa13.8 Msi
110 GPa16 Msi

Shear Modulus

36 GPa5.2 Msi
42 GPa6.1 Msi

Bulk Modulus

115 GPa16.7 Msi
102 GPa14.8 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.34
0.32

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

234 MPa33.9 ksi
700 MPa102 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

110 MPa16 ksi
300 MPa43.5 ksi

Elongation at Break

26%
8%

Compressive Strength

260 MPa37.7 ksi
—

Shear Strength

165 MPa23.9 ksi
425 MPa61.6 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

76 MPa11 ksi
240 MPa34.8 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

55 HB
192 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

25 HRB
92 HRB

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
50 MPa·√m45.5 ksi·√in

Same in both: Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT) 20 J14.8 ft·lbf

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.8 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
7.53 g/cm³0.27 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

843°C1,549 °F
1,054°C1,929 °F

Liquidus Temperature

954°C1,749 °F
1,064°C1,947 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

72 W/m·K41.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F
42 W/m·K24.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F
419 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

18 µm/m·K10 µin/in·°F
16.2 µm/m·K9 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

170 J/g73.1 BTU/lb
210 J/g90.3 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
300°C572 °F

Min Service Temperature

-200°C-328 °F
-100°C-148 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

16.4 % IACS
8.5 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.05×10⁻⁷ Ω·m4.13 µΩ·in
2.03×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.99 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

58 / 100
80 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.28 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

90 / 100
40 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

90%
50%

Weldability

20 / 100
60 / 100

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
15 / 100

Castability

90 / 100
75 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

80 / 100
30 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

42 MJ/kg18,057 BTU/lb
60 MJ/kg25,795 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.2 kg CO₂/kg
4.2 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

85%
40%

Same in both: Embodied Water 250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

27 kN·m/kg
93 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

10.8 MN·m/kg
14.6 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

64 kJ/m³
409 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

21.7 mm²/s
13.3 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

10
16

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC95500C84400

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC84400C95500
Default conditionAs CastAs Cast
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$$ Specialty
Min. machined wall0.8 mm0.8 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µmRa 1.6 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining. Both take the same 9 finishes: Chrome Plating, Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Gold Plating, Nickel Plating, Painting, Silver Plating, Tin Plating.

C84400 vs C95500 — frequently asked

Is C95500 stronger than C84400?

Yes. C95500 has a typical yield strength of 300 MPa (43.5 ksi) against 110 MPa (16 ksi) for C84400 — about 173% more. Tensile strength is 700 MPa (102 ksi) vs 234 MPa (33.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C84400 or C95500?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$$, specialty); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, C84400 or C95500?

C84400. Its machinability rates excellent (90/100) against fair (40/100) for C95500; for welding the order is C95500 first (good, 60/100) then C84400 (poor, 20/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C84400 and C95500 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.