FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C84400 vs C94400

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C84400 and C94400 are both copper alloy grades. C84400 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 234 MPa (33.9 ksi) against 221 MPa (32.1 ksi) for C94400, about 6% more. C84400 is the more ductile: elongation 26% versus 18% for C94400. C84400 is stiffer (95 GPa vs 76 GPa) and C94400 runs hotter in service (230°C vs 200°C continuous). On the shop floor, C94400 sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than C84400 (specialty, $$$$$).

C84400Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

C94400Choose it when the part sees heat, or when cost is the deciding factor.

C84400 vs C94400: properties

C84400C94400

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

95 GPa13.8 Msi
76 GPa11 Msi

Shear Modulus

36 GPa5.2 Msi
28 GPa4.1 Msi

Bulk Modulus

115 GPa16.7 Msi
—

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

234 MPa33.9 ksi
221 MPa32.1 ksi

Elongation at Break

26%
18%

Compressive Strength

260 MPa37.7 ksi
205 MPa29.7 ksi

Shear Strength

165 MPa23.9 ksi
150 MPa21.8 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

20 J14.8 ft·lbf
10 J7.4 ft·lbf

Hardness, Rockwell B

25 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

—
58 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.34 · Yield Strength (0.2% offset) 110 MPa16 ksi · Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit) 76 MPa11 ksi · Hardness, Brinell 55 HB

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.8 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
8.93 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

843°C1,549 °F
762°C1,404 °F

Same in both: Liquidus Temperature 954°C1,749 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

72 W/m·K41.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F
47 W/m·K27.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

18 µm/m·K10 µin/in·°F
18.5 µm/m·K10.3 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

170 J/g73.1 BTU/lb
—

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
230°C446 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F · Min Service Temperature -200°C-328 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

16.4 % IACS
12 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.05×10⁻⁷ Ω·m4.13 µΩ·in
1.44×10⁻⁷ Ω·m5.67 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

58 / 100
55 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.28 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

90 / 100
82 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

90%
80%

Weldability

20 / 100
12 / 100

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
8 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

80 / 100
45 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
55 / 100

Same in both: Castability 90 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

42 MJ/kg18,057 BTU/lb
55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.2 kg CO₂/kg
3.7 kg CO₂/kg

Same in both: Embodied Water 250 L/kg30 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 85%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

27 kN·m/kg
25 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

10.8 MN·m/kg
8.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

64 kJ/m³
80 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

21.7 mm²/s
14 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

10
7

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC84400C94400

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC84400C94400
CNC machiningYes—
Default conditionAs Cast—
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
Chrome PlatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Tin PlatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C84400 vs C94400 — frequently asked

Is C84400 stronger than C94400?

Yes. C84400 has a typical tensile strength of 234 MPa (33.9 ksi) against 221 MPa (32.1 ksi) for C94400 — about 6% more.

Which is cheaper, C84400 or C94400?

C94400 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while C84400 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, C84400 or C94400?

C84400. Its machinability rates excellent (90/100) against very good (82/100) for C94400; for welding the order is C84400 first (poor, 20/100) then C94400 (not recommended, 12/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C84400 and C94400 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.