FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C86100 vs C95500

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C86100 and C95500 are both copper alloy grades. C86100 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 415 MPa (60.2 ksi) against 300 MPa (43.5 ksi) for C95500, about 38% more; tensile strength follows at 820 MPa (119 ksi) vs 700 MPa (102 ksi). C86100 is the more ductile: elongation 20% versus 8% for C95500, and C86100 is harder (225 HB vs 192 HB). C95500 is stiffer (110 GPa vs 103 GPa) and C95500 runs hotter in service (300°C vs 200°C continuous). On the shop floor, C95500 machines more easily (fair vs poor), C95500 welds better (good vs poor), and C86100 sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than C95500 (specialty, $$$$$).

C86100Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

C95500Choose it when the part sees heat, or when the part is machined in volume.

C86100 vs C95500: properties

C86100C95500

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

103 GPa14.9 Msi
110 GPa16 Msi

Shear Modulus

39 GPa5.7 Msi
42 GPa6.1 Msi

Bulk Modulus

107 GPa15.5 Msi
102 GPa14.8 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.34
0.32

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

820 MPa119 ksi
700 MPa102 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

415 MPa60.2 ksi
300 MPa43.5 ksi

Elongation at Break

20%
8%

Reduction in Area

20%
—

Shear Strength

480 MPa69.6 ksi
425 MPa61.6 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

205 MPa29.7 ksi
240 MPa34.8 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

225 HB
192 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

96 HRB
92 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

235 HV
—

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
50 MPa·√m45.5 ksi·√in

Same in both: Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT) 20 J14.8 ft·lbf

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

862°C1,584 °F
1,054°C1,929 °F

Liquidus Temperature

899°C1,650 °F
1,064°C1,947 °F

Same in both: Density 7.53 g/cm³0.27 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

36 W/m·K20.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F
42 W/m·K24.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F
419 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

21 µm/m·K11.7 µin/in·°F
16.2 µm/m·K9 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

170 J/g73.1 BTU/lb
210 J/g90.3 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
300°C572 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -100°C-148 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

8 % IACS
8.5 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.16×10⁻⁷ Ω·m8.5 µΩ·in
2.03×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.99 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.27 V
-0.28 V

Corrosion Resistance

55 / 100
80 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

30 / 100
40 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

30%
50%

Weldability

30 / 100
60 / 100

Formability (cold)

12 / 100
15 / 100

Castability

80 / 100
75 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

25 / 100
30 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

45 MJ/kg19,347 BTU/lb
60 MJ/kg25,795 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.2 kg CO₂/kg
4.2 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

75%
40%

Same in both: Embodied Water 250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

109 kN·m/kg
93 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

13.7 MN·m/kg
14.6 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

836 kJ/m³
409 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

12.7 mm²/s
13.3 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

14
16

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC95500C86100

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC86100C95500
CNC machining—Yes
Default condition—As Cast
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$$ Specialty
Min. machined wall—0.8 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 1.6 µm
Chrome Plating—Yes
Electropolishing—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Tin Plating—Yes

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C86100 vs C95500 — frequently asked

Is C86100 stronger than C95500?

Yes. C86100 has a typical yield strength of 415 MPa (60.2 ksi) against 300 MPa (43.5 ksi) for C95500 — about 38% more. Tensile strength is 820 MPa (119 ksi) vs 700 MPa (102 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C86100 or C95500?

C86100 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while C95500 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, C86100 or C95500?

C95500. Its machinability rates fair (40/100) against poor (30/100) for C86100; for welding the order is C95500 first (good, 60/100) then C86100 (poor, 30/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C86100 and C95500 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.