FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C70600 vs C76400

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C70600 and C76400 are both copper alloy grades. C76400 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 510 MPa (74 ksi) against 120 MPa (17.4 ksi) for C70600, about 4.3 times as much; tensile strength follows at 585 MPa (84.8 ksi) vs 310 MPa (45 ksi). In exchange, C70600 is the more ductile: elongation 40% versus 4% for C76400, and C76400 is harder (165 HB vs 65 HB). C70600 runs hotter in service (300°C vs 200°C continuous) and C70600 conducts heat better (40 W/m·K vs 29 W/m·K). On the shop floor, C70600 welds better (excellent vs good).

C70600Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

C76400Choose it when strength drives the design.

C70600 vs C76400: properties

C70600C76400

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

124 GPa18 Msi
125 GPa18.1 Msi

Shear Modulus

47 GPa6.8 Msi
46 GPa6.7 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.33
0.35

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

310 MPa45 ksi
585 MPa84.8 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

120 MPa17.4 ksi
510 MPa74 ksi

Elongation at Break

40%
4%

Reduction in Area

60%
—

Shear Strength

205 MPa29.7 ksi
380 MPa55.1 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

125 MPa18.1 ksi
200 MPa29 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

65 HB
165 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

25 HRB
87 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

70 HV
180 HV

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 130 GPa18.9 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.94 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
8.7 g/cm³0.31 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,100°C2,012 °F
1,040°C1,904 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,145°C2,093 °F
1,090°C1,994 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

40 W/m·K23.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
29 W/m·K16.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

17 µm/m·K9.4 µin/in·°F
16.2 µm/m·K9 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

200 J/g86 BTU/lb
—

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

300°C572 °F
200°C392 °F

Min Service Temperature

-195°C-319 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

9.5 % IACS
6 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.82×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.17 µΩ·in
2.9×10⁻⁷ Ω·m11.4 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.28 V
-0.22 V

Corrosion Resistance

78 / 100
68 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

28 / 100
30 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

20%
25%

Weldability

92 / 100
55 / 100

Formability (cold)

90 / 100
45 / 100

Castability

45 / 100
35 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

88 / 100
80 / 100

Polishability

80 / 100
85 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

75 MJ/kg32,244 BTU/lb
78 MJ/kg33,534 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5.2 kg CO₂/kg
5.5 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

30%
40%

Same in both: Embodied Water 320 L/kg38.3 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

35 kN·m/kg
67 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

13.9 MN·m/kg
14.4 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

58 kJ/m³
1,040 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

11.9 mm²/s
8.8 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

6
8

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC70600C76400

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC70600C76400
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C70600 vs C76400 — frequently asked

Is C76400 stronger than C70600?

Yes. C76400 has a typical yield strength of 510 MPa (74 ksi) against 120 MPa (17.4 ksi) for C70600 — about 4.3 times as much. Tensile strength is 585 MPa (84.8 ksi) vs 310 MPa (45 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C70600 or C76400?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, C70600 or C76400?

C70600. Its weldability rates excellent (92/100) against good (55/100) for C76400.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C70600 and C76400 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.