FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C70600 vs C71580

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C70600 and C71580 are both copper alloy grades. C71580 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 150 MPa (21.8 ksi) against 120 MPa (17.4 ksi) for C70600, about 25% more; tensile strength follows at 380 MPa (55.1 ksi) vs 310 MPa (45 ksi). C71580 is harder — 80 HB against 65 HB for C70600 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. C71580 is stiffer (152 GPa vs 124 GPa) and C71580 runs hotter in service (350°C vs 300°C continuous).

C71580Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

C70600 vs C71580: properties

C70600C71580

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

124 GPa18 Msi
152 GPa22 Msi

Shear Modulus

47 GPa6.8 Msi
57 GPa8.3 Msi

Bulk Modulus

130 GPa18.9 Msi
140 GPa20.3 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

310 MPa45 ksi
380 MPa55.1 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

120 MPa17.4 ksi
150 MPa21.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

40%
42%

Reduction in Area

60%
65%

Shear Strength

205 MPa29.7 ksi
275 MPa39.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

125 MPa18.1 ksi
140 MPa20.3 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

65 HB
80 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

25 HRB
40 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

70 HV
85 HV

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
120 J88.5 ft·lbf

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,100°C2,012 °F
1,170°C2,138 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,145°C2,093 °F
1,240°C2,264 °F

Same in both: Density 8.94 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

40 W/m·K23.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
29 W/m·K16.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

17 µm/m·K9.4 µin/in·°F
16.2 µm/m·K9 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

200 J/g86 BTU/lb
220 J/g94.6 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

300°C572 °F
350°C662 °F

Min Service Temperature

-195°C-319 °F
-198°C-324 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

9.5 % IACS
4.6 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.82×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.17 µΩ·in
3.75×10⁻⁷ Ω·m14.8 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.28 V
-0.26 V

Corrosion Resistance

78 / 100
82 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Weldability

92 / 100
88 / 100

Formability (cold)

90 / 100
85 / 100

Castability

45 / 100
58 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

88 / 100
78 / 100

Polishability

80 / 100
75 / 100

Same in both: Machinability 28 / 100 · Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 20%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

75 MJ/kg32,244 BTU/lb
88 MJ/kg37,833 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5.2 kg CO₂/kg
6.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

320 L/kg38.3 gal/lb
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

35 kN·m/kg
43 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

13.9 MN·m/kg
17 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

58 kJ/m³
74 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

11.9 mm²/s
8.6 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

6
4

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC70600C71580

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC70600C71580
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C70600 vs C71580 — frequently asked

Is C71580 stronger than C70600?

Yes. C71580 has a typical yield strength of 150 MPa (21.8 ksi) against 120 MPa (17.4 ksi) for C70600 — about 25% more. Tensile strength is 380 MPa (55.1 ksi) vs 310 MPa (45 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C70600 or C71580?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

When should I choose C70600 over C71580?

Pick C71580 when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C70600 and C71580 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.