FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C70600 vs C71000

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C70600 and C71000 are both copper alloy grades. C70600 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 120 MPa (17.4 ksi) against 110 MPa (16 ksi) for C71000, about 9% more. C71000 is harder — 75 HB against 65 HB for C70600 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. C71000 is stiffer (138 GPa vs 124 GPa) and C70600 conducts electricity better (9.5 % IACS vs 6.5 % IACS).

C70600Choose it when strength drives the design.

C71000Choose it when surface hardness matters.

C70600 vs C71000: properties

C70600C71000

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

124 GPa18 Msi
138 GPa20 Msi

Shear Modulus

47 GPa6.8 Msi
52 GPa7.5 Msi

Bulk Modulus

130 GPa18.9 Msi
132 GPa19.1 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.33
0.32

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

310 MPa45 ksi
340 MPa49.3 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

120 MPa17.4 ksi
110 MPa16 ksi

Reduction in Area

60%
65%

Shear Strength

205 MPa29.7 ksi
240 MPa34.8 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

125 MPa18.1 ksi
140 MPa20.3 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

65 HB
75 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

25 HRB
40 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

70 HV
80 HV

Same in both: Elongation at Break 40%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,100°C2,012 °F
1,099°C2,010 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,145°C2,093 °F
1,149°C2,100 °F

Same in both: Density 8.94 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

40 W/m·K23.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
37 W/m·K21.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F
380 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

17 µm/m·K9.4 µin/in·°F
15.6 µm/m·K8.7 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

200 J/g86 BTU/lb
205 J/g88.1 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

300°C572 °F
320°C608 °F

Min Service Temperature

-195°C-319 °F
-200°C-328 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

9.5 % IACS
6.5 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.82×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.17 µΩ·in
2.65×10⁻⁷ Ω·m10.4 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.28 V
-0.27 V

Corrosion Resistance

78 / 100
75 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

28 / 100
20 / 100

Weldability

92 / 100
85 / 100

Polishability

80 / 100
85 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 20% · Formability (cold) 90 / 100 · Castability 45 / 100 · Brazeability / Solderability 88 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

75 MJ/kg32,244 BTU/lb
72 MJ/kg30,954 BTU/lb

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 5.2 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 320 L/kg38.3 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

35 kN·m/kg
38 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

13.9 MN·m/kg
15.4 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

58 kJ/m³
44 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

11.9 mm²/s
10.9 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 6

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC70600C71000

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC70600C71000
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C70600 vs C71000 — frequently asked

Is C70600 stronger than C71000?

Yes. C70600 has a typical yield strength of 120 MPa (17.4 ksi) against 110 MPa (16 ksi) for C71000 — about 9% more. Tensile strength is 310 MPa (45 ksi) vs 340 MPa (49.3 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C70600 or C71000?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, C70600 or C71000?

C70600, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 28/100 against 20/100 for C71000; for welding the order is C70600 first (excellent, 92/100) then C71000 (excellent, 85/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C70600 and C71000 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.