FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C70600 vs C71640

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C70600 and C71640 are both copper alloy grades. C71640 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 220 MPa (31.9 ksi) against 120 MPa (17.4 ksi) for C70600, about 83% more; tensile strength follows at 515 MPa (74.7 ksi) vs 310 MPa (45 ksi). In exchange, C70600 is the more ductile: elongation 40% versus 35% for C71640, and C71640 is harder (120 HB vs 65 HB). C71640 is stiffer (152 GPa vs 124 GPa) and C70600 conducts heat better (40 W/m·K vs 25 W/m·K).

C70600Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

C71640Choose it when strength drives the design.

C70600 vs C71640: properties

C70600C71640

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

124 GPa18 Msi
152 GPa22 Msi

Shear Modulus

47 GPa6.8 Msi
57 GPa8.3 Msi

Bulk Modulus

130 GPa18.9 Msi
140 GPa20.3 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.33
0.32

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

310 MPa45 ksi
515 MPa74.7 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

120 MPa17.4 ksi
220 MPa31.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

40%
35%

Shear Strength

205 MPa29.7 ksi
340 MPa49.3 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

125 MPa18.1 ksi
170 MPa24.7 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

65 HB
120 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

25 HRB
68 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

70 HV
125 HV

Same in both: Reduction in Area 60%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,100°C2,012 °F
1,171°C2,140 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,145°C2,093 °F
1,238°C2,260 °F

Same in both: Density 8.94 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

40 W/m·K23.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
25 W/m·K14.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

17 µm/m·K9.4 µin/in·°F
15.9 µm/m·K8.8 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

200 J/g86 BTU/lb
220 J/g94.6 BTU/lb

Min Service Temperature

-195°C-319 °F
-200°C-328 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 300°C572 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

9.5 % IACS
4.3 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.82×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.17 µΩ·in
4×10⁻⁷ Ω·m15.7 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.28 V
-0.26 V

Corrosion Resistance

78 / 100
80 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Weldability

92 / 100
85 / 100

Formability (cold)

90 / 100
80 / 100

Castability

45 / 100
40 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

88 / 100
75 / 100

Polishability

80 / 100
70 / 100

Same in both: Machinability 28 / 100 · Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 20%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

75 MJ/kg32,244 BTU/lb
95 MJ/kg40,843 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5.2 kg CO₂/kg
7.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

320 L/kg38.3 gal/lb
350 L/kg41.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

35 kN·m/kg
58 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

13.9 MN·m/kg
17 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

58 kJ/m³
159 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

11.9 mm²/s
7.4 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

6
5

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC70600C71640

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC70600C71640
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C70600 vs C71640 — frequently asked

Is C71640 stronger than C70600?

Yes. C71640 has a typical yield strength of 220 MPa (31.9 ksi) against 120 MPa (17.4 ksi) for C70600 — about 83% more. Tensile strength is 515 MPa (74.7 ksi) vs 310 MPa (45 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C70600 or C71640?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, C70600 or C71640?

C70600. Its weldability rates excellent (92/100) against excellent (85/100) for C71640.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C70600 and C71640 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.