FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C70600 vs C71520

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C70600 and C71520 are both copper alloy grades. C71520 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 140 MPa (20.3 ksi) against 120 MPa (17.4 ksi) for C70600, about 17% more; tensile strength follows at 380 MPa (55.1 ksi) vs 310 MPa (45 ksi). C71520 is the more ductile: elongation 45% versus 40% for C70600, and C71520 is harder (85 HB vs 65 HB). C71520 is stiffer (152 GPa vs 124 GPa) and C71520 runs hotter in service (350°C vs 300°C continuous).

C71520Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

C70600 vs C71520: properties

C70600C71520

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

124 GPa18 Msi
152 GPa22 Msi

Shear Modulus

47 GPa6.8 Msi
57 GPa8.3 Msi

Bulk Modulus

130 GPa18.9 Msi
158 GPa22.9 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.33
0.34

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

310 MPa45 ksi
380 MPa55.1 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

120 MPa17.4 ksi
140 MPa20.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

40%
45%

Shear Strength

205 MPa29.7 ksi
235 MPa34.1 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

125 MPa18.1 ksi
140 MPa20.3 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

65 HB
85 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

25 HRB
42 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

70 HV
95 HV

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
130 J95.9 ft·lbf

Same in both: Reduction in Area 60%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,100°C2,012 °F
1,171°C2,140 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,145°C2,093 °F
1,238°C2,260 °F

Same in both: Density 8.94 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

40 W/m·K23.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
29 W/m·K16.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

17 µm/m·K9.4 µin/in·°F
16.2 µm/m·K9 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

200 J/g86 BTU/lb
215 J/g92.4 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

300°C572 °F
350°C662 °F

Min Service Temperature

-195°C-319 °F
-198°C-324 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

9.5 % IACS
4.6 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.82×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.17 µΩ·in
3.75×10⁻⁷ Ω·m14.8 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.28 V
-0.25 V

Corrosion Resistance

78 / 100
80 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

28 / 100
25 / 100

Weldability

92 / 100
90 / 100

Castability

45 / 100
50 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

88 / 100
80 / 100

Polishability

80 / 100
75 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 20% · Formability (cold) 90 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

75 MJ/kg32,244 BTU/lb
90 MJ/kg38,693 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5.2 kg CO₂/kg
6.6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

320 L/kg38.3 gal/lb
260 L/kg31.2 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

30%
35%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

35 kN·m/kg
43 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

13.9 MN·m/kg
17 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

58 kJ/m³
64 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

11.9 mm²/s
8.6 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

6
4

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC70600C71520

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC70600C71520
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C70600 vs C71520 — frequently asked

Is C71520 stronger than C70600?

Yes. C71520 has a typical yield strength of 140 MPa (20.3 ksi) against 120 MPa (17.4 ksi) for C70600 — about 17% more. Tensile strength is 380 MPa (55.1 ksi) vs 310 MPa (45 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C70600 or C71520?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

When should I choose C70600 over C71520?

Pick C71520 when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C70600 and C71520 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.