FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C70500 vs C70600

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C70500 and C70600 are both copper alloy grades. C70600 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 120 MPa (17.4 ksi) against 105 MPa (15.2 ksi) for C70500, about 14% more; tensile strength follows at 310 MPa (45 ksi) vs 275 MPa (39.9 ksi). C70600 is harder — 65 HB against 55 HB for C70500 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. C70500 conducts heat better (90 W/m·K vs 40 W/m·K). On the shop floor, C70600 welds better (excellent vs very good).

C70600Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

C70500 vs C70600: properties

C70500C70600

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Shear Modulus

46 GPa6.7 Msi
47 GPa6.8 Msi

Bulk Modulus

132 GPa19.1 Msi
130 GPa18.9 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.34
0.33

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

275 MPa39.9 ksi
310 MPa45 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

105 MPa15.2 ksi
120 MPa17.4 ksi

Reduction in Area

55%
60%

Shear Strength

190 MPa27.6 ksi
205 MPa29.7 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

100 MPa14.5 ksi
125 MPa18.1 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

55 HB
65 HB

Hardness, Vickers

58 HV
70 HV

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
25 HRB

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 124 GPa18 Msi · Elongation at Break 40%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.9 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
8.94 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,090°C1,994 °F
1,100°C2,012 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,105°C2,021 °F
1,145°C2,093 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

90 W/m·K52 BTU/hr·ft·°F
40 W/m·K23.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

17.1 µm/m·K9.5 µin/in·°F
17 µm/m·K9.4 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

210 J/g90.3 BTU/lb
200 J/g86 BTU/lb

Min Service Temperature

-200°C-328 °F
-195°C-319 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 300°C572 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

25 % IACS
9.5 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

6.9×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.72 µΩ·in
1.82×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.17 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.26 V
-0.28 V

Corrosion Resistance

58 / 100
78 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

22 / 100
28 / 100

Weldability

80 / 100
92 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

85 / 100
88 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
80 / 100

Castability

—
45 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 20% · Formability (cold) 90 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

60 MJ/kg25,795 BTU/lb
75 MJ/kg32,244 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4 kg CO₂/kg
5.2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb
320 L/kg38.3 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

35%
30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

31 kN·m/kg
35 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

44 kJ/m³
58 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

26.8 mm²/s
11.9 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

12
6

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 13.9 MN·m/kg

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC70600C70500

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC70500C70600
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C70500 vs C70600 — frequently asked

Is C70600 stronger than C70500?

Yes. C70600 has a typical yield strength of 120 MPa (17.4 ksi) against 105 MPa (15.2 ksi) for C70500 — about 14% more. Tensile strength is 310 MPa (45 ksi) vs 275 MPa (39.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C70500 or C70600?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, C70500 or C70600?

C70600, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 28/100 against 22/100 for C70500; for welding the order is C70600 first (excellent, 92/100) then C70500 (very good, 80/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C70500 and C70600 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.