FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C70600 vs C75400

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C70600 and C75400 are both copper alloy grades. C75400 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 425 MPa (61.6 ksi) against 120 MPa (17.4 ksi) for C70600, about 3.5 times as much; tensile strength follows at 515 MPa (74.7 ksi) vs 310 MPa (45 ksi). In exchange, C70600 is the more ductile: elongation 40% versus 12% for C75400, and C75400 is harder (140 HB vs 65 HB). C70600 runs hotter in service (300°C vs 200°C continuous) and C70600 conducts electricity better (9.5 % IACS vs 6.5 % IACS). On the shop floor, C70600 welds better (excellent vs fair).

C70600Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

C75400Choose it when strength drives the design.

C70600 vs C75400: properties

C70600C75400

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

124 GPa18 Msi
125 GPa18.1 Msi

Bulk Modulus

130 GPa18.9 Msi
122 GPa17.7 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

310 MPa45 ksi
515 MPa74.7 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

120 MPa17.4 ksi
425 MPa61.6 ksi

Elongation at Break

40%
12%

Reduction in Area

60%
—

Shear Strength

205 MPa29.7 ksi
330 MPa47.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

125 MPa18.1 ksi
190 MPa27.6 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

65 HB
140 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

25 HRB
75 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

70 HV
150 HV

Same in both: Shear Modulus 47 GPa6.8 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.94 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
8.72 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,100°C2,012 °F
1,021°C1,870 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,145°C2,093 °F
1,054°C1,929 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

40 W/m·K23.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
37 W/m·K21.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

17 µm/m·K9.4 µin/in·°F
16.2 µm/m·K9 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

200 J/g86 BTU/lb
—

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

300°C572 °F
200°C392 °F

Min Service Temperature

-195°C-319 °F
-200°C-328 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

9.5 % IACS
6.5 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.82×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.17 µΩ·in
2.65×10⁻⁷ Ω·m10.4 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.28 V
-0.27 V

Corrosion Resistance

78 / 100
66 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

28 / 100
30 / 100

Weldability

92 / 100
45 / 100

Formability (cold)

90 / 100
55 / 100

Castability

45 / 100
—

Brazeability / Solderability

88 / 100
80 / 100

Polishability

80 / 100
88 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 20%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

75 MJ/kg32,244 BTU/lb
78 MJ/kg33,534 BTU/lb

Embodied Water

320 L/kg38.3 gal/lb
260 L/kg31.2 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

30%
40%

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 5.2 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

35 kN·m/kg
59 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

13.9 MN·m/kg
14.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

58 kJ/m³
723 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

11.9 mm²/s
11.3 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

6
9

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC70600C75400

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC70600C75400
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C70600 vs C75400 — frequently asked

Is C75400 stronger than C70600?

Yes. C75400 has a typical yield strength of 425 MPa (61.6 ksi) against 120 MPa (17.4 ksi) for C70600 — about 3.5 times as much. Tensile strength is 515 MPa (74.7 ksi) vs 310 MPa (45 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C70600 or C75400?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, C70600 or C75400?

C70600. Its weldability rates excellent (92/100) against fair (45/100) for C75400.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C70600 and C75400 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.