FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C70600 vs C75200

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C70600 and C75200 are both copper alloy grades. C75200 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 427 MPa (61.9 ksi) against 120 MPa (17.4 ksi) for C70600, about 3.6 times as much; tensile strength follows at 517 MPa (75 ksi) vs 310 MPa (45 ksi). In exchange, C70600 is the more ductile: elongation 40% versus 6% for C75200, and C75200 is harder (160 HB vs 65 HB). C70600 runs hotter in service (300°C vs 200°C continuous) and C70600 conducts heat better (40 W/m·K vs 33 W/m·K). On the shop floor, C70600 welds better (excellent vs fair).

C70600Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

C75200Choose it when strength drives the design.

C70600 vs C75200: properties

C70600C75200

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

124 GPa18 Msi
125 GPa18.1 Msi

Bulk Modulus

130 GPa18.9 Msi
122 GPa17.7 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

310 MPa45 ksi
517 MPa75 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

120 MPa17.4 ksi
427 MPa61.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

40%
6%

Reduction in Area

60%
—

Shear Strength

205 MPa29.7 ksi
330 MPa47.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

125 MPa18.1 ksi
185 MPa26.8 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

65 HB
160 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

25 HRB
85 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

70 HV
170 HV

Same in both: Shear Modulus 47 GPa6.8 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.94 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
8.73 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,100°C2,012 °F
1,021°C1,870 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,145°C2,093 °F
1,110°C2,030 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

40 W/m·K23.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
33 W/m·K19.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

17 µm/m·K9.4 µin/in·°F
16.2 µm/m·K9 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

300°C572 °F
200°C392 °F

Min Service Temperature

-195°C-319 °F
-200°C-328 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 200 J/g86 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

9.5 % IACS
6 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.82×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.17 µΩ·in
2.87×10⁻⁷ Ω·m11.3 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.28 V
-0.26 V

Corrosion Resistance

78 / 100
65 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

28 / 100
25 / 100

Weldability

92 / 100
45 / 100

Formability (cold)

90 / 100
50 / 100

Castability

45 / 100
40 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

88 / 100
85 / 100

Polishability

80 / 100
92 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 20%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

75 MJ/kg32,244 BTU/lb
82 MJ/kg35,254 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5.2 kg CO₂/kg
5.6 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

30%
40%

Same in both: Embodied Water 320 L/kg38.3 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

35 kN·m/kg
59 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

13.9 MN·m/kg
14.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

58 kJ/m³
729 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

11.9 mm²/s
10 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

6
8

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC70600C75200

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC70600C75200
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C70600 vs C75200 — frequently asked

Is C75200 stronger than C70600?

Yes. C75200 has a typical yield strength of 427 MPa (61.9 ksi) against 120 MPa (17.4 ksi) for C70600 — about 3.6 times as much. Tensile strength is 517 MPa (75 ksi) vs 310 MPa (45 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C70600 or C75200?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, C70600 or C75200?

C70600. Its weldability rates excellent (92/100) against fair (45/100) for C75200.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C70600 and C75200 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.