FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C70600 vs C73500

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C70600 and C73500 are both copper alloy grades. C73500 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 415 MPa (60.2 ksi) against 120 MPa (17.4 ksi) for C70600, about 3.5 times as much; tensile strength follows at 480 MPa (69.6 ksi) vs 310 MPa (45 ksi). In exchange, C70600 is the more ductile: elongation 40% versus 10% for C73500, and C73500 is harder (130 HB vs 65 HB). C70600 runs hotter in service (300°C vs 175°C continuous) and C70600 conducts heat better (40 W/m·K vs 33 W/m·K). On the shop floor, C70600 welds better (excellent vs good).

C70600Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

C73500Choose it when strength drives the design.

C70600 vs C73500: properties

C70600C73500

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

124 GPa18 Msi
127 GPa18.4 Msi

Bulk Modulus

130 GPa18.9 Msi
128 GPa18.6 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.33
0.34

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

310 MPa45 ksi
480 MPa69.6 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

120 MPa17.4 ksi
415 MPa60.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

40%
10%

Reduction in Area

60%
—

Shear Strength

205 MPa29.7 ksi
330 MPa47.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

125 MPa18.1 ksi
210 MPa30.5 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

65 HB
130 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

25 HRB
72 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

70 HV
140 HV

Same in both: Shear Modulus 47 GPa6.8 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.94 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
8.86 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,100°C2,012 °F
1,080°C1,976 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,145°C2,093 °F
1,110°C2,030 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

40 W/m·K23.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
33 W/m·K19.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

17 µm/m·K9.4 µin/in·°F
16.2 µm/m·K9 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

200 J/g86 BTU/lb
210 J/g90.3 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

300°C572 °F
175°C347 °F

Min Service Temperature

-195°C-319 °F
-200°C-328 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

9.5 % IACS
6.2 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.82×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.17 µΩ·in
2.78×10⁻⁷ Ω·m10.9 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.28 V
-0.25 V

Corrosion Resistance

78 / 100
62 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

28 / 100
30 / 100

Weldability

92 / 100
55 / 100

Formability (cold)

90 / 100
55 / 100

Castability

45 / 100
40 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

88 / 100
85 / 100

Polishability

80 / 100
90 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 20%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

75 MJ/kg32,244 BTU/lb
78 MJ/kg33,534 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5.2 kg CO₂/kg
5.6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

320 L/kg38.3 gal/lb
250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

30%
35%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

35 kN·m/kg
54 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

13.9 MN·m/kg
14.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

58 kJ/m³
678 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

11.9 mm²/s
9.9 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

6
8

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC70600C73500

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC70600C73500
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C70600 vs C73500 — frequently asked

Is C73500 stronger than C70600?

Yes. C73500 has a typical yield strength of 415 MPa (60.2 ksi) against 120 MPa (17.4 ksi) for C70600 — about 3.5 times as much. Tensile strength is 480 MPa (69.6 ksi) vs 310 MPa (45 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C70600 or C73500?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, C70600 or C73500?

C70600. Its weldability rates excellent (92/100) against good (55/100) for C73500.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C70600 and C73500 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.