FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C70600 vs C72200

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C70600 and C72200 are both copper alloy grades. C72200 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 150 MPa (21.8 ksi) against 120 MPa (17.4 ksi) for C70600, about 25% more; tensile strength follows at 385 MPa (55.8 ksi) vs 310 MPa (45 ksi). C72200 is harder — 78 HB against 65 HB for C70600 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. C72200 is stiffer (145 GPa vs 124 GPa) and C70600 conducts heat better (40 W/m·K vs 34 W/m·K). On the shop floor, C70600 welds better (excellent vs very good).

C70600Choose it when it will be welded.

C72200Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

C70600 vs C72200: properties

C70600C72200

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

124 GPa18 Msi
145 GPa21 Msi

Shear Modulus

47 GPa6.8 Msi
55 GPa8 Msi

Bulk Modulus

130 GPa18.9 Msi
140 GPa20.3 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

310 MPa45 ksi
385 MPa55.8 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

120 MPa17.4 ksi
150 MPa21.8 ksi

Shear Strength

205 MPa29.7 ksi
250 MPa36.3 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

125 MPa18.1 ksi
150 MPa21.8 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

65 HB
78 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

25 HRB
35 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

70 HV
82 HV

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
100 J73.8 ft·lbf

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Elongation at Break 40% · Reduction in Area 60%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,100°C2,012 °F
1,130°C2,066 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,145°C2,093 °F
1,180°C2,156 °F

Same in both: Density 8.94 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

40 W/m·K23.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
34 W/m·K19.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

17 µm/m·K9.4 µin/in·°F
15.7 µm/m·K8.7 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

200 J/g86 BTU/lb
210 J/g90.3 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

300°C572 °F
320°C608 °F

Min Service Temperature

-195°C-319 °F
-200°C-328 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

9.5 % IACS
5.5 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.82×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.17 µΩ·in
3.13×10⁻⁷ Ω·m12.3 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.28 V
-0.24 V

Corrosion Resistance

78 / 100
82 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

28 / 100
30 / 100

Weldability

92 / 100
80 / 100

Formability (cold)

90 / 100
85 / 100

Castability

45 / 100
—

Brazeability / Solderability

88 / 100
85 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 20% · Polishability 80 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

75 MJ/kg32,244 BTU/lb
92 MJ/kg39,553 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5.2 kg CO₂/kg
6.2 kg CO₂/kg

Same in both: Embodied Water 320 L/kg38.3 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

35 kN·m/kg
43 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

13.9 MN·m/kg
16.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

58 kJ/m³
78 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

11.9 mm²/s
10.1 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 6

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC70600C72200

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC70600C72200
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C70600 vs C72200 — frequently asked

Is C72200 stronger than C70600?

Yes. C72200 has a typical yield strength of 150 MPa (21.8 ksi) against 120 MPa (17.4 ksi) for C70600 — about 25% more. Tensile strength is 385 MPa (55.8 ksi) vs 310 MPa (45 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C70600 or C72200?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, C70600 or C72200?

C70600. Its weldability rates excellent (92/100) against very good (80/100) for C72200.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C70600 and C72200 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.