FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C70600 vs C72150

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C70600 and C72150 are both copper alloy grades. C72150 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 200 MPa (29 ksi) against 120 MPa (17.4 ksi) for C70600, about 67% more; tensile strength follows at 460 MPa (66.7 ksi) vs 310 MPa (45 ksi). C72150 is harder — 90 HB against 65 HB for C70600 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. C72150 is stiffer (162 GPa vs 124 GPa) and C72150 runs hotter in service (500°C vs 300°C continuous). On the shop floor, C70600 welds better (excellent vs good).

C70600Choose it when it will be welded.

C72150Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

C70600 vs C72150: properties

C70600C72150

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

124 GPa18 Msi
162 GPa23.5 Msi

Shear Modulus

47 GPa6.8 Msi
61 GPa8.8 Msi

Bulk Modulus

130 GPa18.9 Msi
158 GPa22.9 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

310 MPa45 ksi
460 MPa66.7 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

120 MPa17.4 ksi
200 MPa29 ksi

Elongation at Break

40%
38%

Reduction in Area

60%
55%

Shear Strength

205 MPa29.7 ksi
320 MPa46.4 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

125 MPa18.1 ksi
190 MPa27.6 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

65 HB
90 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

25 HRB
58 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

70 HV
95 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.94 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
8.9 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,100°C2,012 °F
1,280°C2,336 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,145°C2,093 °F
1,300°C2,372 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

40 W/m·K23.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
21 W/m·K12.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F
410 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

17 µm/m·K9.4 µin/in·°F
14.9 µm/m·K8.3 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

200 J/g86 BTU/lb
250 J/g107 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

300°C572 °F
500°C932 °F

Min Service Temperature

-195°C-319 °F
-250°C-418 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

9.5 % IACS
3.5 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.82×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.17 µΩ·in
4.9×10⁻⁷ Ω·m19.3 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.28 V
-0.18 V

Corrosion Resistance

78 / 100
68 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

28 / 100
25 / 100

Weldability

92 / 100
60 / 100

Formability (cold)

90 / 100
85 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

88 / 100
75 / 100

Polishability

80 / 100
70 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 20% · Castability 45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

75 MJ/kg32,244 BTU/lb
115 MJ/kg49,441 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5.2 kg CO₂/kg
8 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

320 L/kg38.3 gal/lb
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

30%
20%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

35 kN·m/kg
52 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

13.9 MN·m/kg
18.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

58 kJ/m³
123 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

11.9 mm²/s
5.8 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

6
4

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC70600C72150

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC70600C72150
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C70600 vs C72150 — frequently asked

Is C72150 stronger than C70600?

Yes. C72150 has a typical yield strength of 200 MPa (29 ksi) against 120 MPa (17.4 ksi) for C70600 — about 67% more. Tensile strength is 460 MPa (66.7 ksi) vs 310 MPa (45 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C70600 or C72150?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, C70600 or C72150?

C70600. Its weldability rates excellent (92/100) against good (60/100) for C72150.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C70600 and C72150 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.