FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C70600 vs C71900

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C70600 and C71900 are both copper alloy grades. C71900 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) against 120 MPa (17.4 ksi) for C70600, about 4.6 times as much; tensile strength follows at 760 MPa (110 ksi) vs 310 MPa (45 ksi). In exchange, C70600 is the more ductile: elongation 40% versus 15% for C71900, and C71900 is harder (230 HB vs 65 HB). C71900 is stiffer (152 GPa vs 124 GPa) and C70600 conducts heat better (40 W/m·K vs 32 W/m·K). On the shop floor, C70600 welds better (excellent vs good).

C70600Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when it will be welded.

C71900Choose it when strength drives the design.

C70600 vs C71900: properties

C70600C71900

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

124 GPa18 Msi
152 GPa22 Msi

Shear Modulus

47 GPa6.8 Msi
57 GPa8.3 Msi

Bulk Modulus

130 GPa18.9 Msi
150 GPa21.8 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

310 MPa45 ksi
760 MPa110 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

120 MPa17.4 ksi
550 MPa79.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

40%
15%

Reduction in Area

60%
35%

Shear Strength

205 MPa29.7 ksi
470 MPa68.2 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

125 MPa18.1 ksi
300 MPa43.5 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

65 HB
230 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

25 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

70 HV
250 HV

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
60 J44.3 ft·lbf

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
24 HRC

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,100°C2,012 °F
1,200°C2,192 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,145°C2,093 °F
1,240°C2,264 °F

Same in both: Density 8.94 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

40 W/m·K23.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
32 W/m·K18.5 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

17 µm/m·K9.4 µin/in·°F
15.5 µm/m·K8.6 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

200 J/g86 BTU/lb
205 J/g88.1 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

300°C572 °F
320°C608 °F

Min Service Temperature

-195°C-319 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

9.5 % IACS
5.5 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.82×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.17 µΩ·in
3.13×10⁻⁷ Ω·m12.3 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.28 V
-0.25 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 78 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Weldability

92 / 100
55 / 100

Formability (cold)

90 / 100
40 / 100

Castability

45 / 100
—

Brazeability / Solderability

88 / 100
70 / 100

Same in both: Machinability 28 / 100 · Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 20% · Polishability 80 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5.2 kg CO₂/kg
5.5 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

30%
25%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 75 MJ/kg32,244 BTU/lb · Embodied Water 320 L/kg38.3 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

35 kN·m/kg
85 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

13.9 MN·m/kg
17 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

58 kJ/m³
995 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

11.9 mm²/s
9.5 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

6
10

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC70600C71900

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC70600C71900
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C70600 vs C71900 — frequently asked

Is C71900 stronger than C70600?

Yes. C71900 has a typical yield strength of 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) against 120 MPa (17.4 ksi) for C70600 — about 4.6 times as much. Tensile strength is 760 MPa (110 ksi) vs 310 MPa (45 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C70600 or C71900?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, C70600 or C71900?

C70600. Its weldability rates excellent (92/100) against good (55/100) for C71900.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C70600 and C71900 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.