FabDigitFabDigit

T800H vs UMS40

Composite · grade comparison

T800H and UMS40 are both composite grades. T800H is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 5,490 MPa (796 ksi) against 4,560 MPa (661 ksi) for UMS40, about 20% more. T800H is the more ductile: elongation 1.9% versus 1.2% for UMS40. UMS40 is stiffer (395 GPa vs 294 GPa) and UMS40 conducts heat better (50 W/m·K vs 35 W/m·K).

T800HChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

T800H vs UMS40: properties

T800HUMS40

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

294 GPa42.6 Msi
395 GPa57.3 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

5,490 MPa796 ksi
4,560 MPa661 ksi

Elongation at Break

1.9%
1.2%

Compressive Strength

2,400 MPa348 ksi
1,000 MPa145 ksi

Poisson's Ratio

—
0.27

Flexural Strength

—
1,450 MPa210 ksi

Flexural Modulus

—
230 GPa33.4 Msi

Shear Strength

—
85 MPa12.3 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.81 g/cm³0.07 lb/in³
1.79 g/cm³0.06 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

35 W/m·K20.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F
50 W/m·K28.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

750 J/kg·K0.18 BTU/lb·°F
710 J/kg·K0.17 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

-0.56 µm/m·K-0.31 µin/in·°F
-1 µm/m·K-0.56 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

500°C932 °F
—

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 400°C752 °F · Min Service Temperature -269°C-452 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1.4×10⁻⁵ Ω·m551 µΩ·in
1×10⁻⁵ Ω·m394 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

92 / 100
90 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

85 / 100
95 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

18 / 100
25 / 100

Polishability

—
40 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

500 MJ/kg214,962 BTU/lb
700 MJ/kg300,946 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

34 kg CO₂/kg
50 kg CO₂/kg

Same in both: Embodied Water 600 L/kg71.9 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

3,033 kN·m/kg
2,547 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

162.4 MN·m/kg
220.7 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

25.8 mm²/s
39.3 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

-1,167
-577

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every composite grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

1101001,000510Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityT800HUMS40
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

T800H vs UMS40 — frequently asked

Is T800H stronger than UMS40?

Yes. T800H has a typical tensile strength of 5,490 MPa (796 ksi) against 4,560 MPa (661 ksi) for UMS40 — about 20% more.

Which is cheaper, T800H or UMS40?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, T800H or UMS40?

UMS40, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 25/100 against 18/100 for T800H.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in T800H and UMS40 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.