FabDigitFabDigit

AS4 vs T800H

Composite · grade comparison

AS4 and T800H are both composite grades. T800H is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 5,490 MPa (796 ksi) against 4,433 MPa (643 ksi) for AS4, about 24% more. T800H is stiffer (294 GPa vs 231 GPa) and T800H conducts heat better (35 W/m·K vs 6.8 W/m·K). On the shop floor, AS4 machines more easily (30 vs 18 out of 100).

AS4Choose it when the part is machined in volume.

T800HChoose it when strength drives the design.

AS4 vs T800H: properties

AS4T800H

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

231 GPa33.5 Msi
294 GPa42.6 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

4,433 MPa643 ksi
5,490 MPa796 ksi

Elongation at Break

1.8%
1.9%

Compressive Strength

2,700 MPa392 ksi
2,400 MPa348 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.79 g/cm³0.06 lb/in³
1.81 g/cm³0.07 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

6.8 W/m·K3.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F
35 W/m·K20.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

712 J/kg·K0.17 BTU/lb·°F
750 J/kg·K0.18 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

-0.4 µm/m·K-0.22 µin/in·°F
-0.56 µm/m·K-0.31 µin/in·°F

Limiting Oxygen Index

55%
—

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

—
500°C932 °F

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 400°C752 °F · Min Service Temperature -269°C-452 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1.7×10⁻⁵ Ω·m669 µΩ·in
1.4×10⁻⁵ Ω·m551 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

90 / 100
92 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

—
85 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

30 / 100
18 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

320 MJ/kg137,575 BTU/lb
500 MJ/kg214,962 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

24 kg CO₂/kg
34 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

—
600 L/kg71.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

2,477 kN·m/kg
3,033 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

129.1 MN·m/kg
162.4 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

5.3 mm²/s
25.8 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

-326
-1,167

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every composite grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

1101001,000510Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityAS4T800H
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

AS4 vs T800H — frequently asked

Is T800H stronger than AS4?

Yes. T800H has a typical tensile strength of 5,490 MPa (796 ksi) against 4,433 MPa (643 ksi) for AS4 — about 24% more.

Which is cheaper, AS4 or T800H?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, AS4 or T800H?

AS4, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 30/100 against 18/100 for T800H.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in AS4 and T800H side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.