FabDigitFabDigit

8552 vs T800H

Composite · grade comparison

8552 and T800H are both composite grades. T800H is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 5,490 MPa (796 ksi) against 2,720 MPa (395 ksi) for 8552, about 102% more. T800H is the more ductile: elongation 1.9% versus 1.6% for 8552. 8552 is lighter (1.57 g/cm³ vs 1.81 g/cm³ for T800H) and T800H is stiffer (294 GPa vs 164 GPa). On the shop floor, 8552 machines more easily (30 vs 18 out of 100).

8552Choose it when weight is the constraint, or when the part is machined in volume.

T800HChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

8552 vs T800H: properties

8552T800H

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

164 GPa23.8 Msi
294 GPa42.6 Msi

Shear Modulus

5 GPa0.73 Msi
—

Poisson's Ratio

0.32
—

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

2,720 MPa395 ksi
5,490 MPa796 ksi

Elongation at Break

1.6%
1.9%

Compressive Strength

1,690 MPa245 ksi
2,400 MPa348 ksi

Compressive Modulus

150 GPa21.8 Msi
—

Flexural Strength

1,800 MPa261 ksi
—

Flexural Modulus

148 GPa21.5 Msi
—

Shear Strength

118 MPa17.1 ksi
—

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.57 g/cm³0.06 lb/in³
1.81 g/cm³0.07 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

200°C392 °F
—

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.05%
—

Water Absorption (Saturation)

1.1%
—

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

4 W/m·K2.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F
35 W/m·K20.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
750 J/kg·K0.18 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

-0.4 µm/m·K-0.22 µin/in·°F
-0.56 µm/m·K-0.31 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

120°C248 °F
400°C752 °F

Min Service Temperature

-55°C-67 °F
-269°C-452 °F

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

180°C356 °F
500°C932 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1.5×10⁻⁵ Ω·m591 µΩ·in
1.4×10⁻⁵ Ω·m551 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

90 / 100
92 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

30 / 100
85 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

30 / 100
18 / 100

Polishability

40 / 100
—

Mold Temperature (typ.)

180°C356 °F
—

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

30 kg CO₂/kg
34 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

500 L/kg59.9 gal/lb
600 L/kg71.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 500 MJ/kg214,962 BTU/lb · Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

1,732 kN·m/kg
3,033 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

104.5 MN·m/kg
162.4 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

2.8 mm²/s
25.8 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

-166
-1,167

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every composite grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

1101001,000510Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability8552T800H
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

8552 vs T800H — frequently asked

Is T800H stronger than 8552?

Yes. T800H has a typical tensile strength of 5,490 MPa (796 ksi) against 2,720 MPa (395 ksi) for 8552 — about 102% more.

Which is cheaper, 8552 or T800H?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 8552 or T800H?

8552, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 30/100 against 18/100 for T800H.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 8552 and T800H side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.