FabDigitFabDigit

T1000G vs T800H

Composite · grade comparison

T1000G and T800H are both composite grades. T1000G is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 6,370 MPa (924 ksi) against 5,490 MPa (796 ksi) for T800H, about 16% more. T1000G is the more ductile: elongation 2.2% versus 1.9% for T800H. T800H conducts heat better (35 W/m·K vs 10 W/m·K).

T1000GChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

T1000G vs T800H: properties

T1000GT800H

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Poisson's Ratio

0.27
—

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

6,370 MPa924 ksi
5,490 MPa796 ksi

Elongation at Break

2.2%
1.9%

Compressive Strength

1,570 MPa228 ksi
2,400 MPa348 ksi

Flexural Strength

1,800 MPa261 ksi
—

Flexural Modulus

165 GPa23.9 Msi
—

Shear Strength

100 MPa14.5 ksi
—

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 294 GPa42.6 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.8 g/cm³0.07 lb/in³
1.81 g/cm³0.07 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

10 W/m·K5.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F
35 W/m·K20.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

-0.5 µm/m·K-0.28 µin/in·°F
-0.56 µm/m·K-0.31 µin/in·°F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 750 J/kg·K0.18 BTU/lb·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 400°C752 °F · Min Service Temperature -269°C-452 °F · Max Service Temperature (short-term) 500°C932 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Volume Resistivity

0 Ω·cm
—

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1.4×10⁻⁵ Ω·m551 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

UV / Weathering Resistance

95 / 100
85 / 100

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 92 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

15 / 100
18 / 100

Polishability

40 / 100
—

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

600 MJ/kg257,954 BTU/lb
500 MJ/kg214,962 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

35 kg CO₂/kg
34 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

400 L/kg47.9 gal/lb
600 L/kg71.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

3,539 kN·m/kg
3,033 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

163.3 MN·m/kg
162.4 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

7.4 mm²/s
25.8 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

-433
-1,167

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every composite grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

1101001,000510Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityT1000GT800H
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

T1000G vs T800H — frequently asked

Is T1000G stronger than T800H?

Yes. T1000G has a typical tensile strength of 6,370 MPa (924 ksi) against 5,490 MPa (796 ksi) for T800H — about 16% more.

Which is cheaper, T1000G or T800H?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

When should I choose T1000G over T800H?

Pick T1000G when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in T1000G and T800H side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.